Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal theme Q - Foreshore [pdf, 559 KB]

   Rangahaua Whanui Nat ional Theme q THE FORESHORE RICHARD P BOAST November 1996 Firs t Release WA I T A N G I TR I B U N A L R A N G A H A U A W H A N U I S E R I E S Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 11a: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 11

2. Rangahaua Whanui National Overview volume 2 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   NATIONAL OVERVIEW volume i i Professor Alan Ward Waitangi Tribunal Rangahaua Whanui Series WAITANGI TRIBUNAL 1997 A Waitangi Tribunal publication © Copyright Waitangi Tribunal 1997 isbn 1-86956-208-9 Edited and produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by GP Publications, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by GP Print, Wellington, New Zealand Set in Times Roman This report was commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui research programme. Any views expr

3. Reid v New Zealand Law Society [2023] NZLCDT 7 (24 March 2023) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...not to have been referred to the Tribunal by way of charges, involving as it did a serious breach of confidence in aggravating circumstances.” The second relevant charge arose after that former partner committed suicide. She sent his estate a fees account for $67,500 whereas numerous texts and emails proved she had agreed to undertake the work without fee. [32] We are troubled by her pattern of failure to observe professional boundaries. In her case before us, she did not address...

4. Putman v Jenmark Homes Ltd [pdf, 230 KB]

   No: 00026 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of An adjudication claim Between Christopher David Aaron Putman and Cathryn Joan Putman Claimant And Jenmark Homes Limited First respondent And Approved Building Certifiers Limited Second respondent And B W Lee Housecheck Ltd Third respondent And Brent Lee Fourth respondent And Tony Heron Fifth respondent Determination of Ad

5. Proactive release - Electoral Amendment Bill and Referendums Framework Bill [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   Hon Andrew Little Minister for Justice Proactive release - Electoral Amendment Bill and Referendums Framework Bill Date of issue: 13 August 2019 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public inter

6. Henton v REAA, Max House & Barfoot & Thompson Ltd [2013] NZREADT 18 [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...as a consequence of conduct by a salesperson. When Barfoot & Thompson refused Mr Henton's demand for compensation, the proper course for Mr Henton to have followed, if he believed there was a basis for his claim, would have been to bring a civil claim seeking compensation. Instead, he made a disciplinary complaint. This has led to a proliferation of proceedings with: (a) Mr Henton's underlying complaint about the salesperson still working its way through the system wit...

7. [2020] NZREADT 30 Cavanagh (23 July 2020) [pdf, 545 KB]

   ...material provided to the Tribunal. [b] The onus is on the applicant to satisfy the Tribunal, on the basis of “sufficient and adequate information”, that he is a fit and proper person to hold a licence. The standard of proof is the ordinary civil standard of the balance of probabilities.9 [c] The factors relevant to the assessment of whether an applicant is a fit and proper person to hold a salesperson’s licence are:10 [i] The focus is necessarily forward-looking. The funct...

8. [2024] NZREADT 40 - CAC v Tafilipepe (25 October 2024) [pdf, 367 KB]

   ...Tribunal may receive any document or information that may, in its opinion, assist it, whether or not that document or information would be admissible in a court.4 Subject to that and other matters, the Evidence Act 2006 applies.5 [30] It is the civil standard of proof, the balance of probabilities, that is applicable.6 However, the quality of the evidence required to meet that standard may differ in cogency, depending on the gravity of the charges.7 [31] The charge of miscondu...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 179 Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC r=J-q of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a Notice of Motion under s 87G of the Act requesting the granting of resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED ('PANUKU') (ENV-2018-AKL-0

10. Chalecki v ACC [2015] NZACA 1 [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...complained was missing from the Corporation’s file had been on the file, it was unlikely that a rehabilitation grant would have been approved. This was because the Corporation “felt” the grant would not have led to his increased independence. Civil proceedings against Corporation [66] In about 1996, Mr Chalecki sued the Corporation in a civil action for breach of statutory duty, negligence and misfeasance. He alleged that the Corporation had pressured him into self-employment...