Search Results

1. [2023] NZREADT 16 - CAC 1901 v KC (3 July 2023) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...property before she arrived home. They have spent money on a security door, lighting, cameras and an alarm system on the advice of the Police. They have also fenced the whole property. [34] They were shocked about what had happened. They no longer feel safe in the house. It has had a big impact on their family life. Their son is now traumatised and afraid. It has caused an immense amount of pressure and distress. If she had known about even one previous break-in, she would never ha...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 111 Weston Lea Limited v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 23 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Court: Hearing: Appearances: Decision [2021] NZEnvC \ \ \ IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND BETWEEN of appeals under to s 120 of the RMA WESTON LEA LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-308) AND AND Appellant DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2019-AKL-310) Appellant HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Judge] A Smith Commissioner S K Prime Commissioner AP Gy

3. Ngataki v Kumete - Parish of Karaka Lot 64D (2016) 121 Waikato Maniapoto MB 184 (121 WMN 184) [pdf, 383 KB]

   121 Waikato Maniapoto MB 184 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A19990008028 A20030004701 A20030004702 UNDER Sections 24 and 315 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF PARISH OF KARAKA LOT 64D BLOCK (WHATAPAKA MARAE) AND PARISH OF KARAKA LOT 64A BLOCK (GENERAL LAND) BETWEEN TED NGATAKI AND RENA NGATAKI ON BEHALF OF THE TRUSTEES OF WHATAPAKA MARAE Applicants AND NGAHUIA KUMETE, SHARON

4. Alchin and Scott TRI 2020-100-001 [2022] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 [pdf, 374 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2020-100-001 [2022] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 BETWEEN ROSEMARY ALICE ALCHIN and SIMON FRANCIS SCOTT Claimants AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 6 and 7 May 2021 and 21 October 2021 Closing submissions: Claimants 11 November 2021 Respondents 25 November 2021 Claimants reply 2 December 2021 Appearances: Scott McKenna and Amin Osama for the claimants Paul Robertson and John Tian for the first respondent

5. Access to Justice Technical Survey Report - October 2024 [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   0 ACCESS TO JUSTICE: LEGAL NEEDS SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT FINAL REPORT 29 October 2024 1 Table of Contents 1 Background and purpose of Legal Needs Survey ...........................................................................5 2 Sampling .....................................................................................................6 2.1 Recruiting adults .........................................

6. Directory of Official Information S-U [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

7. Directory of Official Information S-U [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

8. Roos v Wang [2010] NZWHT Auckland 10 [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...Morrell confirms that the signatures on the producer statement and material guarantee and warranty “could be” those of Mr Kiff. That is correct so far as it goes. However, the test the claimants must meet is not “could be” but rather the civil standard of proof, namely the balance of probabilities. The claimants are also incorrect to contend that it is Mr Kiff’s responsibility to prove forgery. On the contrary, the claimants carry the burden of proof (i.e. that the d...

9. Beniston v Subritzky - Estate of Huhana Subritzky [2016] Chief Judge's MB 178 (2016 CJ 178) [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...Oturu B1 - $40.00 ) Oturu B2 - $9.00 ) Nos. 12, 13, 14, 15 & 16. Oturu B3 - $4.00 ) Okakewai B2B2A - $83.00 Nos. 1, 4, 7, 8, 11, 9, 10 Okahu 4C1 - $15.00 Nos. 2, 5 Order 32/53 Ben Card 6137 & 26854 ($18.66) $5.00 to Registrar, fee on application Balance to applicant Copy minutes to applicant Copy minutes to Sec. Te Hapua 42 8. The Court minute only records Robert Subritzky as being present at the hearing. 9. The orders so made vested the deceased...

10. Regulatory Impact Statement: Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal [pdf, 466 KB]

    ...tribunal process is used instead of informal settlement negotiations under the status quo. This assumes the uptake of the tribunal option is greater than the current uptake of court-based dispute resolution, based on the proposed absence of filing fees; anecdotal evidence that insurers and claimants are motivated to resolve disputes; evidence from analogous tribunals; and our understanding of the likely complexity of cases and the tribunal’s proposed operating model. Low (monetisabl...