Search Results

1. Ministry of Justice consultation paper on Phase Two of the AML/CFT Act [pdf, 317 KB]

   ...AML/CFT requirements and monitor and enforce compliance. They monitor reporting entities by carrying out reviews, on-site visits and other activities. Penalties for not complying with the Act Businesses that fail to comply with the Act can face civil and criminal penalties. Sanctions for non- compliance include formal warnings for minor breaches or fines and prison terms for serious breaches. Individuals can be sentenced to up to 2 years in prison and fined up to $300,000; body corporat...

2. MZ v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 12 (4 March 2019) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...by the client to Mr Sun. He would file the visa application with the relevant New Zealand government department and maintain contact with it. Mr Sun was not allowed to contact the client, except through the company’s staff. The company’s fees were set out in the agreement. [7] A “Private Immigration Agency Business License” was issued to the Shanghai company by the Ministry of Public Security in 2012. 3 [8] On 22 December 2012, the complainant entered into an agreeme...

3. [2021] NZREADT 40 – Beath (29 July 2021) [pdf, 389 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 40 IN THE MATTER OF Appeals under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 READT 025/2020 BETWEEN STEPHEN GEORGE WILLIAM BEATH Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 409) First Respondent AND MIKE PERO REAL ESTATE LTD Second Respondent READT 033/2020 BETWEEN STEPHEN GEORGE WILLIAM BEATH Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHO

4. [2015] NZEmpC 230 FIRST Union Inc v Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd [pdf, 365 KB]

   FIRST UNION INC v JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED T/A MITRE 10 MEGA, DUNEDIN, AND MITRE 10, MOSGIEL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 230 [17 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 230 EMPC 175/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FIRST UNION INC Plaintiff AND JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED T/A MITRE 10 MEGA, DUNEDIN, AND MITRE 10, MOSGIEL Defendant

5. Cao v Tony Tay and Associates Ltd (in liq) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 26 [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...Tao and Mr Cao initially intended to undertake remedial work prior to proceedings for adjudication. However they have been unable to afford this and have based their claim on the estimated cost of remedial work of $622,275 including professional fees and consent fees. [3] The claimants allege that the Auckland City Council, Brian William Newth, Tony Tay and Selina Tay are responsible for the defects in resulting damage. The Auckland City Council was the territorial author...

6. National Standards Committee 1 v Deliu [2016] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 408 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 26 LCDT 008/12 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 1 Applicant AND FRANCISC CATALIN DELIU of Auckland, Lawyer CHAIR Ms M Scholtens QC MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms S Hughes QC Ms J Gray Mr W Smith Mr P Shaw HEARING at Auckland DATE 30 September – 9 October, 10 December 2015 (with LCDT 010/10) DATE OF DECISION 15 September 2016 APPEARANCES Mr

7. Wells & Anor v REAA CAC 20007 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 36 [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...to the transaction generally. We have observed above that Mr Lee seemed to have undertaken all necessary steps or, certainly, he and Mr Robinson between them did. [90] Ms Cunninghame also observed that, if we had power to award costs as does a civil Court, she would have sought costs against the appellants should the licensee be successful. We do not currently have such power and can only, in appropriate circumstances, order costs against a licensee. [91] The overall submission fo...

8. Ringwood v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 44 [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...damages should be followed in this case and general damages are set at $25,000. [87] Consequential losses are claimed in the sum of $30,329.85. These represent the costs of temporary rental accommodation, storage and moving costs, valuation fees, insurance and expert‟s fees. Invoices to support these claims were produced. No challenge was made to the sum claimed. It is accepted that this claim is made out. Conclusion as to Quantum [88] The claim has been es...

9. Brown v New Zealand Post Ltd (Recusal Application) [2016] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...information concerning the reasons why certain trespass notices were issued and declining the requests for information under s 18(h) of the Official Information Act and s 29(1)(j) of the Privacy Act 1993. [43.15] Photocopy of page taken from New Zealand Civil Rights Handbook [44] In summary, the statement of claim filed by Mr Brown on 11 July 2016 is best described as a sparse document as far as content is concerned. It does not briefly and clearly state the facts giving rise to Mr Bro...

10. [2023] NZEmpC 227 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 280 KB]

    ...undertaking their work for the direct benefit of the Overseeing Shepherd or any of his subordinate leadership group, or that it was directed at a perceived communal good. There are, as Mr Kirkness pointed out, analogies with the work undertaken by civil servants, employed to benefit the community they serve rather than the specific organ that signs the employment agreement and pays their wages. Rather it can be said that the state organ is the employer because it has ultimate responsibili...