LCRO 36/2018 AA v SM (19 December 2018) [pdf, 250 KB]
...LO elsewhere for independent advice”. [23] The Committee stated that in such circumstances Mr SM “should have identified the conflict of interest in acting for, or attempting to act for [Ms LO] and referred” her to a different lawyer. Fees [24] Because [Firm 2], not Mr SM, acted on the estate administration, the Committee declined jurisdiction to consider Mr AA complaint against Mr SM in respect of [Firm 2]’s fees for that legal work. Application for review [25] Mr...