4422 items matching your search terms
LAURA JANE GEORGE v AUCKLAND COUNCIL NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 179 [27 September 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 179 ARC 91/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed by special leave BETWEEN LAURA JANE GEORGE Plaintiff AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Defendant ARC 124/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed BETWEEN AUCKLAND COUNCIL Plaintiff AND LAURA JANE GEORGE Defendant Hearin
Regulatory Impact Analysis: Regulatory Impact Statement – Developing a supervision regime for returning offenders | 1 Regulatory Impact Statement Management of offenders returning to New Zealand Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of the establishment of a supervision regime for offenders who are returning to New Zealand after serving a prison sentence overseas. The pro
...Board‟s liability as determined by this Court. I agree with Mr Bevan and am confident, now apportionment has been determined, that counsel will be able to reach agreement on the issue of medical expenses. I would, however, allow Dr Gadsden‟s fees and expenses in full. In relation to the claim for dental expenses, Mr Bevan submitted: “Ms Clear completely fails to show causation in respect of her dental expenses, which relate to pre-existing bruxism (teeth grinding).” I ag...
Regulatory Impact Analysis: Regulatory Impact Statement – Developing a supervision regime for returning offenders | 1 Regulatory Impact Statement Management of offenders returning to New Zealand Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of the establishment of a supervision regime for offenders who are returning to New Zealand after serving a prison sentence overseas. The pro
...been: "Prepared by Mark Russell" with no reference to any limitation of liability. The second page is effectively a personal promotion by him of the services presented by the report and refers to an account for "my" fees. The only reference to the limited liability company other than in the letterhead is in the signature page at the end which forms part of the document headed "Land Information Summary". It could well have been misinterpreted a...
...HB’s lawyer informed them that if they did not cooperate with Mrs HB who wanted to sell the property, then Mrs HB would consider applying to the Court for a sale order. [63] The standard of proof to be applied in disciplinary hearings, is the “civil standard, the balance of probabilities, which is applied flexibly according to the seriousness of matters to be proved and the consequences of proving them”.15 [64] From the information produced, I do not consider Mr MB has prove...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 078 Ref: LCRO 138/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the NZLS [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN FK Applicant AND LM Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applic
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [201 BJ NZEnvC ~ of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal under s 195 RMA THE WELLINGTON COMPANY LIMITED ("TWC") (ENV-2017 -WLG-000038) Appellant THE SAVE ERSKINE COLLEGE TRUST ("SECT") Respondent HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUH
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [201 BJ NZEnvC ~ of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal under s 195 RMA THE WELLINGTON COMPANY LIMITED ("TWC") (ENV-2017 -WLG-000038) Appellant THE SAVE ERSKINE COLLEGE TRUST ("SECT") Respondent HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUH
...Agreement. [34] Owners may claim against all the various respondents in tort for negligence in respect of faulty design, workmanship, supervision, inspection and/or approval of the building work. [35] Under section 90 of the Building Act 1991 civil proceedings may only be brought against a building certifier in tort and not in contract. [36] The owners claim against the First respondent, John Glover, in contract for breach of contractual warranties and in tort for breach...