Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 249 Bayswater Marina Berth-Holders Association Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...public access and parking, and reiterates at (d) that 20 temporary car and boat trailer parking spaces will be provided for users of the boat ramp at the times during construction that the boat ramp is open and accessible. [29] There is also a feedback loop provided for condition 33 which is unexceptional. [30] At condition 39, there is an added set of objectives for the Construction Traffic Management Plan. These are addressed towards public safety and enabling access for ro...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 31 RHB Chartered Accountants Limited and Brown and Wilkins v Rawcliffe [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...not been universally accepted. In Newcastle City Council v Wieland, 35 the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered the recoverability of mediation costs in circumstances where mediation had been ordered by the Court pursuant to s 26 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (under which the Court may refer any proceedings before it to mediation, where it considers the circumstances appropriate, and may do so with or without the agreement of the parties). Mediations occurring pursuant t...

3. INZ (Calder) v Tian [2019] NZIACDT 58 (27 August 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...providing for the regulation of persons who give immigration advice. [45] The focus of professional disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but the protection of the public:5 …It is well established that professional disciplinary proceedings are civil and not criminal in nature. That is because the purpose of statutory disciplinary proceedings for various occupations is not to punish the practitioner for misbehaviour, although it may have that effect, but to ensure that appropr...

4. [2022] NZREADT 24 - Complaints Assessment Committee 2103 v Sharma (14 November 2022) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...tenant had paid $2,320 in bond money to Mr Sharma or the management company. [48] The tenant was interviewed on 26 February 2020 and signed a statement on 8 May 2020. She had paid $2,320 in bond money, along with $580 in rent and a letting fee of $667, a total of $3,567, in cash to Ms Galuszewski. She received a receipt (two receipts dated 1 and 16 March 2016 have been provided to the Tribunal). They set up a regular rental payment to Ray White. 4 Committee’s bundle of...

5. Henderson v Nisbet - Karamu GB (Balance) [2024] Chief Judge's MB 156 (2024 CJ 156) [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...available or not known of at the time the order was made or through submissions on the law. [19] As stated in Tau v Nga Whānau o Morven and Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX Block, the Chief Judge must exercise their jurisdiction by applying the civil standard of proof 2024 Chief Judge's MB 168 on the balance of probabilities, having regard to that standard’s inherent flexibility that takes into account the nature and gravity of the matter at issue.4 This means that the...

6. Decisions-about-special-patient-leave-and-change-of-legal-status.pdf [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   ...to ensure the privacy of special patients and the independence of members to engage in frank discussion. It is an offence to tell the public what happens during a proceeding, or to disclose private medical records. 12. Members will be immune from civil proceedings as a result of their decision-making, unless it is demonstrated that the member acted in bad faith. 13. The Special Patient Review Tribunal will develop procedures to respond to conflicts of interest. Members are expected to...

7. Regulatory Impact Statement - Criminal justice proposals to counter foreign interference in New Zealand [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   Re$TRICTeC> UNCLASSIFIED Regulatory Impact Statement: Criminal justice proposals to counter foreign interference targeting New Zealand Coversheet Purpose of Document Decision sought: Advising agencies: Proposing Ministers: Date finalised: Problem Definition This analysis was produced to inform final Cabinet decisions on proposals to amend the Crimes Act 1961 . The Ministry of Justice is responsible for the development of this Regulatory Impact Statement. Minister of

8. E99 Karl Cook and Vijay Lala – Planning - RE – Applicant [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   31093433_1.docx BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2018-AKL-000078 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of the direct referral of applications for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority REBUTTAL EVIDENC

9. Malik v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 7 [pdf, 313 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000004 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 7 BETWEEN AMIT MALIK AND MELISSA MARGARET DAWN MALIK Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND EVERBRIGHT HOMES LIMITED (struck off Companies Register) (Removed) Second Respondent AND PUTZ TECHNIK PRODUCTS LIMITED (struck off Companies Register) (Removed) Third Respondent AND HITCHINS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND ABLE WATERPROOFING LIMITE

10. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Park [2023] NZLCDT 51 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 327 KB]

    THE NAMES OF THE COMPLAINANT AND HER SISTER, THE FAMILY NAME OF THE CLIENT, MR PARK’S FORMER EMPLOYER AND FIRM NAME, MR PARK’S FELLOW EMPLOYEE WHO ATTENDED THE 22 JUNE MEETING, AND THE NAME OF THE LAWYER WHO PROVIDED AN OPINION OF THE WILL FOR MR PARK’S FIRM SHALL NOT BE PUBLISHED. THESE ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZLCDT 51 LCDT 006/23 IN THE MATTER of t