Search Results

1. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 566 KB]

   ...are sufficient to justify an exception to the fundamental rule of open justice.2 [7] Ms A, the aggrieved person, was the consumer of health services in this matter. The case accordingly involves sensitive matters arising from Ms A’s health information, including matters relating to the circumstances of her death. [8] Ms A is deceased and, as such, it is not possible to seek her opinion on the suppression of her name and identifying details. However, the parties advise that the s...

2. [2024] NZREADT 25 - CAC 2107 v RCG Reality Ltd (29 July 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...operating a trust account and a guide for trust accounts and audit documentation for 3 RCG to complete. Once again, no notification of appointment of an auditor was received by the Authority. [14] On 9 December 2020, the Authority emailed RCG requesting that it complete the notification of auditor form. [15] On 23 April 2020, RCG engaged REB chartered accountants (the auditor) to audit the trust account. [16] On 11 December 2020, the Authority received a signed notification...

3. LCRO 341/2013 QE v ML (nee BM) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...do so by no later than 8 August 2014. Otherwise, the review will proceed on this basis and this Office will be in touch to schedule the first hearing. [6] Ms GH indicated agreement with the proposed procedure by letter dated 4 August 2014 and requested the opportunity to respond to further submissions made by Ms ML to the Standards Committee which Mr QE had not had the opportunity to respond to. That has been provided in the course of this review. [7] A hearing was not able to...

4. LCRO 94/2019 EL v UD (15 May 2020) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...decision of the [YXC] to close [location] was a mistake which had adverse consequences for members of the [City A] community. [27] It is clear that Mr EL retains an absolute conviction that both the engineering assessments and legal analysis that informed and underpinned the Council’s decision to close the centre was flawed. [28] Whilst it will become clear that I agree with the Committee’s decision to take no further action on Mr EL’s complaints, I arrive at similar conclusio...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 173 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ Inc [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...notice dated 7 January 2016. Since 8 June 2016, the parties have met and bargained on approximately 30 occasions between June and 7 December 2016. [6] Following a bargaining session on 1 December 2016, officials from MUNZ held a meeting to inform members that no progress was being made with regard to bargaining. A proposal which had been advanced for LPC at that time was rejected. A secret ballot was then conducted, with members voting unanimously in favour of strike action....

6. Phillips - Ahipara A4 (2021) 438 Aotea MB 10 (438 AOT 10) [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...accepted at a beneficiary meeting of the Phillips Whānau Trust held by Zoom on 25 April 2021. The 13 Clarke v Karaitiana [2011] NZCA 154, [2011] NZAR 370. 14 At [51]. 438 Aotea MB 22 minutes are on file as is notice of the meeting and forms recording consent to be appointed a trustee, with relevant information included. [28] Henare and Lorraine King and others from that side of the whānau were not present at this meeting for reasons that are not entirely clear. Docu...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 203 Director-General of Conservation v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   Director-General of Conservation & McGuinness Institute Limited v MDC & The New Zealand King Salmon Co Limited – Consent Order IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 203 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under s120 of the Act BETWEEN DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2022-CHC-67) AND MCGUINNESS INSTITUTE LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-68) Appellants AND MARLBOROUGH

8. Murphy & Anor v CAC301 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 44 [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...and provide as follows: “6 Standards of professional conduct … 6.2 A licensee must act in good faith and deal fairly with all parties engaged in a transaction. … 6.4 A licensee must not mislead a customer or client, nor provide false information, nor withhold information that should by law or fairness be provided to a customer or client. … 9 Client care and dealings with customers General … 9.2 A licensee must not engage in any conduct that would put a client,...

9. ZA v YB LCRO 135/2014 (31 August 2016) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...to the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal. Review Hearing [6] Mr ZA attended a review hearing on 23 October 2015. Mr YB was not required to attend and the review hearing proceeded in his absence with his consent. Mr ZA requested a copy of the audio of the review hearing. That has been provided to both parties. Recusal Application [7] Mr ZA requested my recusal from determining this review. For the reasons set out in the decision to which this decision is...

10. Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd [2017] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...specific complaint [103] THE CARTOONS – FINDING AS TO CONTENT [109] THE INTERPRETATION EXERCISE [111] SECTION 61 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 [115] Section 61 HRA – a brief history [118] THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, 1965 [122] The text of Article 4 and Article 5 [123] Criminal and civil measures [126] Article 4 and the right to freedom of expression [134] Whether general conclusions can be drawn from ICERD [140]