Search Results

1. LCRO 191/2019 UY v FB (26 November 2020) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...LSO from a memorandum that had been filed in the court. She felt compelled to provide account to the LSO of a series of emails that had been exchanged with Mr UY. [83] In the course of this exchange (which appears to have been lengthy) Ms FB forms an impression that Ms X supported her position in respect to one of Mr UY’s complaints. [84] Bluntly put, this process is at risk of assuming the mantle of a de-facto hearing, but one in which Mr UY is not involved, and of which he ha...

2. Parihaka Te Kawanata o Rongo Deed of Reconciliation [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...vulnerable removed themselves to Kapiti, the primary root left behind resisted. The potential of peace was conceived, bound by Potatau and Matakatea at Orangituapeka pa, giving rise to new hope and fortitude. Settlements of the past faded and new forms of community arose, they were sanctuaries of collective prosperity. This was a generation born in the depths of war that gave rise to prophets of inspired vision, breaking from their constraints with concepts of empowerment and transform...

3. Willson v CAC301 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 90 [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...professional disciplinary context of course the focus is on the conduct of the practitioner, and not upon its consequences.” [46] We agree with Ms Paterson that the extent of the research and disclosure required of a licensee (independent of any request for information by a purchaser) will depend on the facts of the case, including the nature of the information at issue. In the present case, should a reasonably competent salesperson in the licensee’s position have known about the mi...

4. Allington v REAA & Anor [2014] NZREADT 6 [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...them a few days later to advise that the purchaser of the property was the licensee. The witness asserts that she and the appellant “would have gone up to $750,000 in any negotiations”. She feels that the market should have been properly informed of the correct expectations of the vendors. 5 [16] In cross-examination, Mrs Allington said she regarded Ms Butel as a buyers’ agent for her and the appellant (her husband) and they did not deal directly with the license...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 6 Cornish Trucks and Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [pdf, 279 KB]

   CORNISH TRUCK & VAN LIMITED v BURGERT GILDENHUYS [2019] NZEmpC 6 [4 February 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 6 EMPC 127/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CORNISH TRUCK & VAN LIMITED Plaintiff AND BURGERT GILDENHUYS Defendant Hearing: 4 and 5 October 2018 (H

6. [2021] NZACC 6 - MacDonald v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...Hartshorn completed the Initial Medical Assessment (IMA) on 30 November 2016. He noted that the appellant was experiencing constant low-grade pain, but his mood was reasonable. At that stage the appellant was managing half days at work but not performing any physical work such as grooming or mechanical repairs. Dr Hartshorn noted: This is a role which is generally within the sedentary to light physical demand range and provides postural variability. The job is thus well suited t...

7. LCRO 145/2019 TS v NU and VL (21 January 2020) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...umbrella of a general inquiry as to whether any professional obligations had been breached. [11] Ms TS’s complaint was managed by the Complaints Service through its early resolution process. Neither Ms NU nor Mr VL were required to provide a formal response to the complaint filed though they both were given opportunity to do so. Neither availed themselves of that opportunity. [12] The Standards Committee delivered its decision on 26 August 2019. [13] The Committee determine...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 129 Roberts Street Action Group Incorporated v Taupo District Council [pdf, 412 KB]

   ...interested party notices closed on 12 July 2021. The delay in filing arises out of a misapprehension that the closing date was 15 working days from the date that Restaurant Brands was served with notice of the appeal. Restaurant Brands respectfully requests waiver under s 281(1)(a)(iia) of the RMA to file its interested party notice. In support of its application, it submits: The delay in filing is very short (2 days); There will be no prejudice to RSAG, as Restaurant Brands is gene...

9. Brooking v Andrews - Waipapa 9 and Others (2022) 273 Waiarki MB 35 (2022 WAR 35) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...seek costs. The applicants submit that in that memorandum, they specified that they would await the release of the final minutes and relevant appeal period before filing the application for costs. [20] The applicants submit that due to their request on 26 August 2020 to have parts of the minutes redacted, they did not receive the final minutes until 14 December 2020. 273 Waiariki MB 40 It is submitted that an application for costs was not filed until the final minutes ha...

10. Wynyard v Waata - Manawakore C1 and D (2022) 247 Taitokerau MB 4 (247 TTK 4) [pdf, 260 KB]

    ...and 29 August 2018, however no specific statements of evidence were filed. Due to delays following the Covid- 19 restrictions and scheduling issues, the matter was not set down for hearing until 16 October 2020. [8] On 15 October 2020 a request was received from Diana Ellis for an adjournment of the hearing, as neither herself, Ms Shaw, Ms Wynyard or Ms Jull were able to attend the hearing. Both parties agreed for the fixture to be vacated, with the matter to be determined o...