11041 items matching your search terms
...However, as the Tribunal’s jurisdiction is limited to $30,000.00, I find that this is the amount that the respondent should pay the applicant. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 7 July 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...evidence to the contrary, I accept QG’s account of the agreements reached and what occurred subsequently, as set out in paragraphs one to three above. So, I find that she is entitled to the sum claimed as EK has breached the contract by failing to perform his contractual obligations, with QG receiving nothing in return for the payments she made to EK for the bathroom fit out and the tiles. 8. I also find that EK has engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in trade, contrary to...
...original hearing in the Tribunal, in accordance with the Order of the Disputes Tribunal dated 22 March 2024. No further payment is therefore required. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 6 September 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...Inc liable to refund the $50.00 staff costs and $150.00 venue hire because they closed the bar earlier than agreed? 6. MQ claims she is entitled to a refund of the bond because the bar staff closed the bar earlier than agreed and she was not informed prior. N Inc say that they encountered repeated instances of people drinking in the carpark, and evidence of people drinking alcohol not purchased in the venue in the toilets, activity which was a breach of the terms and conditions of hi...
...to whether a further building could be included, which it could not, so they did not stand to gain financially from the survey result, or fees expended; and d. I considered whether the D’s could be said to have benefitted from the additional information gained, even though it did not prove beneficial, but even so, I am not satisfied that this outcome has resulted in unjust enrichment. 15. As I find that there was no contract, and no quasi-contract resulting in unjust enrichment, it...
...DATE OF DECISION: 25 September 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL THAT INTENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING1 [1] On 26 April 2023, Ms Puia presented for filing in the Tribunal a statement of claim (on the official claim form) purportedly filed under s 98 of the Privacy Act 2020 (the Act). [2] The form on page 5 after Step 3 states: Please tick the boxes that apply to you (refer to the relevant Certificate or notice given by the Privacy Commissioner or [if ap...
...is set-off against the unpaid balance of invoices of $3493.70, represented by JF Ltd’s counter-claim, leaving an amount for JF Ltd to pay to HK and QK of $5021.38. Referee Perfect Date: 26 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...was assisting Mr Mihaka with his case and that Mr Mihaka had decided to reinstate Mr Bourke as counsel. She also advised Mr Mihaka would not be able to file his statement of evidence until he had received a copy of the Police file (which had been requested by him). 4 [17] On or about 25 May 2016 the Tribunal received from Mr Mihaka a handwritten note advising he had authorised Ms Raue to act “as Māori agent” regarding all court and tribunal matters arising from the allegati...
1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 34 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6540: RACHEL ELIZABETH BINNING AND ANGUS PETER WOOD ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] Rachel Binning and Angus Wood are the owners of a leaky home situated at 10 Raumati Terrace, Khandallah. The origina...
...particulars were declined. Air NZ now seeks to strike out the pleadings about breaches of the “Privacy Law Act within the workplace” and “unlawful dismissal”. Ms Rachelle opposed this application. In doing so, her submissions included a request that the causes of action previously struck out be reinstated. [6] The grounds of this application are that, in relation to both pleadings, the personal grievances to which they relate were not raised within 90 days as is require...