Search Results

1. Steele v Board of Trustees of Salisbury School [2012] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...person Mr DM O’Neill for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 16 December 2011 and 23 January 2012 DATE OF DECISION: 7 September 2012 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] The case for Mr Steele is that when on 19 November 2010 he made a request under information privacy principle 6 for access to personal information about him held by the Board of Trustees of Salisbury School, the Board failed to make a decision on that request within the time limit fixed by s 40(1) of the Pr...

2. February Legal Aid News [pdf, 525 KB]

   ...employer’s name or type of benefit)  The application must include whether the customer has control of a trust and/or interest in property (please include property address and market value) If you have any questions in relation to any of this information please do not hesitate to contact the legal aid office 0800 2 LEGAL AID. Repayment of legal aid for domestic violence proceedings An applicant for a protection order in domestic violence proceedings is exempt from the requirem...

3. Argyle v Macdee McLennan Construction Ltd & Ors [2012] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...Proffitt, the assessor and Thomas Wutzler, the claimants’ expert. Some defects were also mentioned in Mr Prouse’s report referred to by the parties. Roof and drip edge [25] There was a failure to turn down the ends of the metal roof to form a drip edge (exacerbated by low pitch) and a failure to form a drip edge to the barge flashing over the kitchen roof. There was a lack of cover to the flashings on the north east and south west elevations. The building underlay had...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 213 Hixon v Campbell and Ors substantive [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...employee records of a number of AHV’s employees to him. 1 Hixon (Labour Inspector) v Campbell [2014] NZERA Christchurch 4. 2 28 April 2014. These included copies of job application forms, employment agreements, and tax forms. Mrs Campbell also provided Mr Hixon with a summary of wages and deductions in respect of individual employees. Whilst these records were incomplete, he was able to compile a schedule of tool allow...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 216 Q v W [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...determinations and all matters to be decided by the Employment Court. [5] The plaintiff deposed that the issue of name suppression on all the Authority’s determinations was never processed by the Authority, although she claims that it was requested on numerous occasions over the years, both verbally and in writing, but that, to date, the issue had never been addressed formally or informally by the Authority. [6] The plaintiff also applied for name suppression for all...

6. Balatbat v Sparks [2016] NZIACDT 27 [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...adviser was involved in the process until a complete set of documents arrived from the Philippines, ready to lodge with Immigration New Zealand. Mr Sparks reviewed the documents, certified he had assisted the complainant with recording the information on the application, and filed the papers with Immigration New Zealand. [3] The regulation of licensed immigration advisers is unusual; there is a prohibition on unlicensed persons providing immigration services. Some persons, such...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 128 McKendry v Jansen & Prouting [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...Remedies (1) Where the Authority or the Court determines that an employee has a personal grievance, it may, in settling the grievance, provide for any 1 or more of the following remedies: (a) reinstatement of the employee in the employee's former position or the placement of the employee in a position no less advantageous to the employee: (b) the reimbursement to the employee of a sum equal to the whole or any part of the wages or other money lost by the employee as a result o...

8. Buck [2010] NZWHT Auckland 34 [pdf, 89 KB]

   1 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 34 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6324: VICKI SUSAN BUCK AND LINDSAY WILLIAM LLOYD – 14 JANE DEANS CLOSE, RICCARTON, CHRISTCHURCH ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Vicki Buck and Lindsay Lloyd are the owners of a house at 14 Jane D...

9. P Singh v Kumar [2011] NZIACDT 24 (18 August 2011) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...The Tribunal set aside the decision. The Adviser had established he took appropriate steps to file the submissions, and reasonably believed the Tribunal had acknowledged receipt. http://www.iaa.govt.nz/ 3 [13] The Adviser’s submissions requested an oral hearing, and set out a response to the complaint. The Tribunal determined the Adviser should have the opportunity of presenting his case at an oral hearing. [14] The parties were informed the procedure at the hearing would ref...

10. Matchitt v Whangara B20 Incorporation - Whangara B20 (2006) 168 Gisborne MB 126 (168 GIS 126) [pdf, 486 KB]

    ...Finally, the evidence for the committee was that the house was uninhabitable, derelict and unsafe for occupancy so they moved to stop habitation on 18 March 2005. It was Dr Te Momo's evidence that the state of the homestead was the ground for requesting that the Matchitts vacate the property on 23 March 2005. The Court noted the committee did not have before it a professional repOlt when they concluded that the house was uninhabitable. A further letter to vacate was issued on 6 May 2...