Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11261 items matching your search terms

  1. IO v XU & M Ltd [2024] NZDT 279 (5 March 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...dismissed. 1 Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004, section 1.6. The definition of “road” includes “a beach”. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 5 March 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

  2. EI v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 322 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...ordered amount is apportioned between the respondent and its insurer is a matter for them. The applicant is limited by the amount claimed in her application. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 18 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

  3. Form 24 Criminal legal aid fixed fees D-F [pdf, 393 KB]

    Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 24 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules D-F Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Date act...

  4. K Ltd v EN [2023] NZDT 690 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 171 KB]

    ...considered EN’s evidence but find on balance the claim is successful. I say this because even if EN did not accept the quote, she must have been aware her insurer did and she did not give evidence that at any time before the work was done, she informed K Ltd that payment would be on actual time and cost, not on the quote. This is consistent with EN’s email to T of 12 June 2023 in which she said we have the go ahead to fix the wall etc from the insurance company. 4. Quotes provide...

  5. ND & OD v MF [2024] NZDT 32 (2 February 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...more likely than not). If a respondent raises a defence to a claim, that defence must also be proved to the same standard of proof. When assessing whether the onus of proof has been discharged by a party, the Tribunal considers and evaluates the information and evidence presented by the parties in a neutral manner, and is also required to take into account the substantial merits and justice (s18(6) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988). 8. I would like to reassure the parties that all inf...

  6. NL v KS Ltd [2020] NZDT 1477 (21 August 2020) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...to remove the $76.82 from the claim. 13. I find the cost relating to the balance of the claim reasonable. 14. Accordingly, KS Ltd must pay B Ltd $3,311.40. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 21 August 2020 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to appl...

  7. Hayward v Barnardos NZ Inc (Jurisdiction) [2022] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 142 KB]

    ...the extent that your concerns were requests for correction of information about you, Barnardos’ decision to attach your comments to the file would comply with its obligations under the Privacy Act. An agency does not have to make changes you have requested if it is satisfied the information is accurate, or an accurate record of its actions at the time. [2] In her reply to the Privacy Commissioner, also dated 21 April 2021, Ms Hayward made comments about various of Barnardos’ Informa...

  8. D Ltd v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 569 (3 November 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...out investigations and reporting in accordance with the requirements of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014. 3. The property was subsequently purchased by P Ltd, part of the DC group of companies. DC signed a transfer of authority form (required under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act) in September 2021 and D Ltd’s work continued. 4. Five of D Ltd’s invoices from August 2021 to October 2022 were paid, and two invoices totalling $19,429.26 remain unpaid....

  9. NF v EN [2024] NZDT 165 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...nuisance or an annoyance to EN in breach of clause 7 of the lease. 13. NF accepted she had parked on the common driveway blocking EN’s entrance to her driveway. She said she did that on the day that EN first put pots on her paving stones, which form part of the area of exclusive use around EN’s flat. She said she did not threaten her but asked her to move the pots so that she could reverse into her garage. 14. NF said she now understood the planter boxes to be on the area of ex...

  10. UO & NO v HS Ltd & JI & HM [2021] NZDT 1587 (21 July 2021) [pdf, 270 KB]

    ...be done. Issues with the drainage 31. Mr N addressed the issues with the driveway drain channel, it was installed without any drainage being connected. In some parts there is concrete in the channel. As a result, when it rained, water pools form beside the house and do not drain properly. 32. UO acknowledged some of the minor issues were fixed by HS, but the significant issues in relation to the roof, cladding, bathroom and shower, windows and drainage still needed to be repai...