Search Results

1. MG v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 548 (23 July 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter. I do however sympathise with MG’s situation. The tenant has since left the neighbouring property. Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 23 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. Coleman v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 41 [pdf, 113 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000117 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 41 BETWEEN ROBYN COLEMAN AND PATRICIA BAMFORD Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND RONALD ANTHONY URLICH AND JANICE WILMA URLICH (Bankrupt and Removed) Second Respondents AND GRAHAM HAYHOW (Deceased and Removed) Third Respondent AND JOHANNES LAURENTIUS APERS Fourth Respondent Hearing: 19 July 2012; closing submissions 26 July 2012 Appeara

3. River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...deputised to apply the Equus system to the gutters. He applied the first two coats. He did not apply the final coat. The Tribunal has already held he had come to an arrangement with the builder for Mr Olsson to apply the final coat, at the request of and ostensibly for Mr Olsson. He had every reason to trust Mr Olsson to do this work particularly as the Olssons had a personal interest, it being their home, as well as Mr Olsson being a qualified builder. This means Mr Sweetman...

4. MJ v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2025] NZACC 007 (14 January 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...for why MJ’s level of impairment had changed since her previous assessment was noted as being “Now unable to work/loss of confidence. Situation has deteriorated”. Medical consultation notes by Dr Conolly dated 10 December 2008 record “forms filled in for reassessment of sensitive claim”, with symptoms noted as “depression, loss of confidence, panic attacks and flash backs”. Dr Conolly also lodged an ACC54 form for the purpose of applying for the reassessment of an exi...

5. SN v K Ltd [2022] NZDT 117 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...raised a dispute from the beginning and it needed to be resolved in the Disputes Tribunal, therefore it would not be appropriate to award interest. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 15 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. BD v J Ltd ES [2021] NZDT 1648 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...calculated in the hearing. Conclusion 12. For these reasons BD is to pay J Limited the sum of $3,753.42 by the date stated in the order. BD’s claim is dismissed. Referee: K Rendall Date: 24 June 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

7. MT v UI [2022] NZDT 54 (9 May 2022) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...months old, and depreciation at 2% was applied to the cost of the replacement turf. 18. The claimed amount of $8,500.20 was reasonably foreseeable and reasonable. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 9 May 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

8. MI v EG [2023] NZDT 194 (23 June 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 What reasonably foreseeable loss can EG prove he has incurred that his insurer is entitled to be compensated for? 12. EG claimed from his insurer to have his motorbike repaired. The repairs were performed for a total cost of $6,444.92. Q Ltd provided a pre-accident valuation that showed EG’s motorbike had an estimated value of $11,000 before the collision. I am therefore satisfied that it was economic to repair the motorbike for $6,444.9

9. NN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 410 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...his purchase price of $11,484.00, and $2,000.00 for legal costs and his own time and inconvenience in dealing with this matter. 3. C Ltd denies the claim saying no such assurance was given. It says NN had completed his purchase by the time any information about potential phone charging capabilities, or otherwise, could be provided to him. 4. The issues to be resolved are: a. Is the bike of acceptable quality and/or fit for any purpose made known by NN? b. If not, is NN entitled...

10. NN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 410 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...his purchase price of $11,484.00, and $2,000.00 for legal costs and his own time and inconvenience in dealing with this matter. 3. C Ltd denies the claim saying no such assurance was given. It says NN had completed his purchase by the time any information about potential phone charging capabilities, or otherwise, could be provided to him. 4. The issues to be resolved are: a. Is the bike of acceptable quality and/or fit for any purpose made known by NN? b. If not, is NN entitled...