Search Results

1. MT v UI [2022] NZDT 54 (9 May 2022) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...months old, and depreciation at 2% was applied to the cost of the replacement turf. 18. The claimed amount of $8,500.20 was reasonably foreseeable and reasonable. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 9 May 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

2. MI v EG [2023] NZDT 194 (23 June 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 What reasonably foreseeable loss can EG prove he has incurred that his insurer is entitled to be compensated for? 12. EG claimed from his insurer to have his motorbike repaired. The repairs were performed for a total cost of $6,444.92. Q Ltd provided a pre-accident valuation that showed EG’s motorbike had an estimated value of $11,000 before the collision. I am therefore satisfied that it was economic to repair the motorbike for $6,444.9

3. NN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 410 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...his purchase price of $11,484.00, and $2,000.00 for legal costs and his own time and inconvenience in dealing with this matter. 3. C Ltd denies the claim saying no such assurance was given. It says NN had completed his purchase by the time any information about potential phone charging capabilities, or otherwise, could be provided to him. 4. The issues to be resolved are: a. Is the bike of acceptable quality and/or fit for any purpose made known by NN? b. If not, is NN entitled...

4. NN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 410 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...his purchase price of $11,484.00, and $2,000.00 for legal costs and his own time and inconvenience in dealing with this matter. 3. C Ltd denies the claim saying no such assurance was given. It says NN had completed his purchase by the time any information about potential phone charging capabilities, or otherwise, could be provided to him. 4. The issues to be resolved are: a. Is the bike of acceptable quality and/or fit for any purpose made known by NN? b. If not, is NN entitled...

5. SE & EE v UT & D Ltd [2024] NZDT 889 (13 December 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...motel while the repair was being undertaken. I agree that the costs are reasonable and therefore order D Ltd to pay the full claimed amount of $1,447.07. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 13 December 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. Form 24 - Criminal legal aid -Tax invoice - schedules D-F [pdf, 394 KB]

   Templates V10 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 24 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules D-F Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Date activ...

7. B Ltd v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 76 (23 February 2023).pdf [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...by email. The applicant also requested NB provide documents required to complete the valuation. [4] On 22 February 2022 NB provided the requested documents. [5] On 8 March 2022 the applicant provided NB with a completed verbal valuation and was informed by the respondent that he no longer required the valuation. [6] On 11 March 2022 the applicant emailed NB asking him if he would like to proceed with the valuation. NB replied by email that; no not going ahead anymore. Sorry for the lat...

8. C Ltd & HN v G Ltd & GX [2024] NZDT 1 (3 January 2024) [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...have a binding agreement for services provided by C Ltd? b. If yes, is the amount claimed reasonable? Did the parties have a binding agreement for services provided by C Ltd? 3. When parties agree to exchange something of value a contract is formed. 4. In this situation C Ltd states it offered attendance at a workshop and coaching sessions for $2587.50 (approximately $7000.00 less than the usual price), GX accepted the offer and attended a workshop 1-3 August 2019 and thereaf...

9. MJ v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2025] NZACC 007 (14 January 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...for why MJ’s level of impairment had changed since her previous assessment was noted as being “Now unable to work/loss of confidence. Situation has deteriorated”. Medical consultation notes by Dr Conolly dated 10 December 2008 record “forms filled in for reassessment of sensitive claim”, with symptoms noted as “depression, loss of confidence, panic attacks and flash backs”. Dr Conolly also lodged an ACC54 form for the purpose of applying for the reassessment of an exi...

10. [2021] NZACC 76 - Herbst v ACC (20 May 2021) [pdf, 220 KB]

    ...[14] Then in his decision of 12 April 2018 (review 5672089) at page 12 the Reviewer noted: … following discussion both parties agreed to an outcome for this review. That was that ACC issue a decision in relation to all four of these claimed entitlement requests (training for independence, transport for independence, concussion clinic referral and funding of orthotics) within two months. As is normally the case that will be a fresh reviewable decision should Ms Herbst d...