Search Results

1. ZZ v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 323 (11 August 2023) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...that the concrete supplied by L Ltd is of acceptable quality. His claim is therefore dismissed and there is no need for me to address the third issue (remedy). Referee: R Merrett Date: 11 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

2. MS v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 763 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Tribunal awards the $5,000.00 MS seeks but deducts the outstanding amounts due under the contract, leaving a balance payable to MS of $2,400.00. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 18 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. EC v LP & CP [2025] NZDT 147 (7 February 2025) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...any, is available to the seller? Was there a binding contract? 4. The buyer lives in [City 1], and the seller lives in [City 2]. The buyer organised a colleague to view the car but had not seen it herself when the seller claims the contract was formed. The buyer submitted that she had no intention to be legally bound to buy the car until she had a chance to inspect it herself. 5. However, the buyer’s subjective intention does not determine whether there was a binding contract. Sinc...

4. DI v DE & UC Ltd [2022] NZDT 105 (13 September 2022) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...is not entitled to make any legal claim under the contract. DI cannot bring a claim for refund of the deposit, therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 13 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. HX v NM [2022] NZDT 206 (25 November 2022) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...was created as a result of a subdivision undertaken by HX. 2. NM purchased the newly subdivided site and engaged a construction company to build a new house. During the course of construction, HX alleges that heavy trucks caused damage in the form of cracks to the approximately 50-year old driveway. He also contends that water pipes were broken twice by NM’s contractors, leading to excessive water bills. 3. HX claims $5,612.95; being $1,550.00 for losses relating to high water bil...

6. A v Van Wijk (Access to File) [2019] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...harassment provisions of s 62(1) of the Human Rights Act 1993. She alleges that when providing her with pastoral care and counselling, the first defendant subjected her to language and physical behaviour of a sexual nature and that he made ongoing requests for sexual activity. [2] In these proceedings Mr Van Wijk is self-represented while the second and third defendants (alleged to be vicariously liable for the actions of Mr Van Wijk pursuant to s 68 of the Act) have filed a joint defe...

7. OIA-104489.pdf [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 104489 15 June 2023 Tēnā koe Your request for official information Thank you for your email of 9 May 2023, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the publication of Disputes Tribunal (the Tribunal) decisions. Specifically, you have requested: Any cabinet papers, reports to mini...

8. Holden —Nga Taonga Tuturu (2010) 245 Aotea MB 230 (245 AOT 230) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...the importance of the various taōnga being found within the rohe claimed by that tribe. Further reference was made to historical associations and connections with the area following the migration of the 1820s. Te Atiawa representatives also requested further hui to be held at local marae to consider the application. Submissions for Muaūpoko [14] All Muaūpoko claimants underscored the longevity of the tribe’s association with the Horowhenua and lower North Island region. Mr...

9. [2021] NZACC 184 - Robinson v ACC (16 November 2021) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...suspension decision was upheld. No appeal has been lodged in respect of that decision. [12] Mr Robinson has cover for a right shoulder injury for which he had ACC funded surgery performed by Mr Brick in 2010. [13] On 13 April 2017, Mr Brick requested funding for further surgery to remove a screw that he had implanted during the previous surgery. [14] On 27 June 2017, the Corporation issued a treatment injury decision approving cover for “right shoulder localised irrit...

10. JL v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 76 (17 June 2022) [pdf, 157 KB]

    ...under this section of the Building Act, a problem or issue raised in the required timeframe is presumed to be a ‘defect’ unless the building contractor or the on-seller/developer prove otherwise. 8. D for N Ltd has provided evidence in the form of vehicle crossing requirements and crossing approvals as well as photographs of all the laying out, to show that the entire job of preparing and laying the driveway and paths was done at the same time as the vehicle crossing. He contends...