Search Results

1. BS v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 168 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...BS paid for the timber to be picked up and set up in the shed in 2019 it is a reasonable inference that he expected to pay for its removal from the shed. 21. For these reasons I am satisfied that BS should pay the fee for the removal of his plank form the shed for which he was invoiced $100 before gst. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 22. Because I have found that there was a quasi-contractual relationship between the parties for the storage of the plank, I am satisfied that...

2. ND v BT [2024] NZDT 830 (22 October 2024) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...pay more than the sum claimed in order to have that work completed, ND’s claim cannot succeed. Referee: C Hawes Date: 22 October 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. HM v BTO Ltd [2020] NZDT 1385 (4 May 2020) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...wasn’t. Most consumers are lay people who would not be privy to chemical and physical elements of materials. 15. In any event even if it was covered with a tarpaulin the whole time, the wood could still be affected by moisture with condensation forming under a tarpaulin. Ideally the wood should be kept in a dry shed for example. Again, there is nothing in the instructions. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 16. MN could not assemble the tub. That was not his fault. The instr...

4. IN v BI [2023] NZDT 345 (18 July 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 345 APPLICANT IN RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In October 2022 IN and BI decided to register and produce a dance performance for the [the festival], which was to take place in [redacted]. No formal agreement was made, rather they started the process together as co-choreographers, (developing the piece under IN’s trading name ‘[G Ltd]’) and obtained a gr...

5. LH & TH v D Inc [2023] NZDT 608 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...refunding the $500.00 bond? b) If so, what are LH and TH entitled to be paid? 5. Have D Inc breached their contract with LH and TH by: a. Not turning off the sprinklers? b. Not refunding the $500.00 bond? 6. Parties to a contract must perform their respective obligations. If they do not, they will be in breach and need to account for any loss caused to the other party to the contract. Did D Inc have a responsibility to turn off the sprinklers, or make arrangements for t...

6. SN v J Ltd & T Ltd [2023] NZDT 606 (15 November 2023) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...Ltd is dismissed. The claim by SN against T Ltd is dismissed. The claim by SN against IT is struck out because IT was not served with the claim. Reasons: 1. In or about August 2022, J Ltd listed its [vehicle] for sale on [the online platform]. On or about 29 August 2022, SN confirmed the purchase of [vehicle] for $37,000.00, by using [the online platform]. 2. Between 29 August 2022 and 5 September 2022 there were some brief messages between SN and IT on behalf of J Ltd. T...

7. BB Ltd OD Ltd v ED Ltd [2019] NZDT 1532 (18 December 2019) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...priority over a security interest relating to same goods. 9. However, I am not persuaded that ED has a lien over the vehicle. There is no worker’s lien for mere storage of goods: a worker’s lien only applies where someone has improved goods by performing work on those goods, not where goods have only been maintained. 10. ED claimed that there was a contractual lien based on verbal agreement. However, the applicants’ representative UN denied any such agreement. ED produced an emai...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 48 Prasad and Tulai v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...the written record of those terms upon which each plaintiff relies. [7] The grounds of the application are first, that the plaintiffs have failed to respond to a notice requiring further and better particulars and secondly, the particulars requested are required in order to fully and fairly inform the defendant in relation to the nature and basis of the plaintiffs’ claims. The defendant claims that it needs to know how the plaintiffs plan to establish the elements of an employm...

9. Wilson v Welch [pdf, 53 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Claim No: 04734 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an Adjudication BETWEEN NEVILLE WILLIAM WILSON and PAUL CECIL WASHER as TRUSTEES for THE NEVILLE WILSON FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND PAUL WELCH and SUZANNE WELCH First Respondents AND ROBIN BAILLIE (Removed) Second Respondent AND GRANT KNOWLES Third Respondent AND GIANNI MARCHESAN Fourth Respondent AND GRAEME JOHNSON (N...

10. Form 23 Criminal legal aid fixed fees A-C [pdf, 388 KB]

    Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 23 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules A-C Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Date act...