11031 items matching your search terms
Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 23 Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules A-C Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus:...
...agreement has been proved in this respect. 47. There are a number of items that I consider it is most likely were not in good working order at the time of settlement. I make this finding on the basis of the evidence submitted by B Ltd, mostly in the form of photos. The list of items in this category, together with the book value, repair or replacement costs as evidenced by B Ltd is: Fire extinguishers $1,536.00 Electrical equipment $505.00 Fuse carrier $21.00 Workshop saf...
...previously been enrolled as barristers/solicitors and could not therefore be approved as representatives under section 38(7) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. An adjournment order was emailed to both parties with the direction “N Ltd is to please inform the Tribunal of their representative’s name and direct phone number prior to the next hearing”. 5. As N LTD did not provide a representative name/direct phone number, I had no N LTD representative to ring for the second hearin...
...$650.00. That leaves a balance of $9,500.00 owed by KL and B Ltd. Due to the Christmas break, I have allowed 28 days for payment rather than the usual 14 days. Referee: J P Smith Date: 10 December 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...
...stress on the new part which caused it to fail after only 2 years and 9 months of use. TT acknowledges that the 2020 Element failed prematurely and ought to have lasted longer than it did. 12. Having carefully considered the available evidence and information, and having heard from the parties, I find that SU has proved on the balance of probabilities that the 2020 Element was not of acceptable quality, but he has not proved on the balance of probabilities that the Cooktop was not of...
...is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of Her Honour, Judge Henare, delivered on 12 December 2023.1 At issue in the appeal were the applicant’s head injury and entitlement to weekly compensation for incapacity dating back to claims in March 1996 and February 2008. The Court dismissed the appeal, for the reasons outlined below. 1 JD v Accident Compensation Corporation [2023] NZACC 202. 2 Background [2] The applicant was granted cover for contusions...
...and is not intended to be a full record of the hearings or of the evidence presented. Was asphalting done with reasonable care and skill, and is the asphalt driveway of acceptable quality? 7. Under contract law, a legally binding contract is formed when both parties intend to contract on agreed terms which they intend to be legally binding. Contracts often have both express terms agreed between parties, and implied terms. The Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (“CGA”) implies minim...
...appointed counsel, Mr M, for NE. Mr M reported to the Court on 27 March 2018. He sought to obtain financial records from IE but at that stage IE told him that they would not be provided. Mr M then requested the Court to order IE to provide that information. It then transpired that IE had not kept adequate records. He has submitted in these proceedings that he was advised by X Ltd that he need not keep records of his expenditure. By not keeping records, he states that he was u...
...parole eligibility. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Taylor v Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2021] NZHRRT 1.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 1 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] On 10 March 2017 Mr Taylor requested the Parole Board to provide him with an audio copy of the telephone conversation between him and his friend. This request was transferred to the Department of Corrections (Corrections). [3] Mr Taylor alleges that his request was not...
...of the administration of the estate. In particular the estate had significant holdings in securities (such as shares, debt securities and unit trusts). It was the view of Mr Shrewsbury that it was negligent of Mr Rothesay not to accede to a request to distribute those shares to the beneficiaries as requested at the commencement of the administration. In the alternative it was argued that if it was not negligent to refuse to distribute the shares and it was proper for the securiti...