Search Results

1. Te Wini v Askelund (Removal of Second Plaintiff) [2015] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...hearing by Mr Askelund are to be filed and served by 5pm on Friday 16 January 2015. [6.4] The proceedings are to be heard at Auckland on Wednesday 4 February 2015. The venue is Hearing Room 5, Chorus House, 41 Federal Street, Auckland. [8] At the request of Mr Te Wini the timetable was amended in that the date for him to file his written statements of evidence was changed from 9 January 2015 to 20 January 2015 and the date for Mr Askelund to file his written statements consequently cha...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...review its ability to provide support for Ms Shaw’s professional development before commenting that, unfortunately, due to ongoing budget constraints and adequate skilled coverage, the DHB continued to be unable to provide the support requested. [55] Ms Bayles ended her reply by noting she had decided to use Ms Shaw’s specialist skills within the “cath lab invasive service and PCI cover” for which she had appropriate knowledge and experience to the overall benefit to...

3. BORA Maungaharuru-Tangitū Hapū Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to sections 20 and 27 (2) of the Bill of Rights Act. [4] Exclusion of Remedy of Compensation - clauses 30(3) and 34(3) 10. Clause 30(3) excludes any form of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure of the Crown to comply with Te Kawenata (a partnership agreement between MTI and the Crown applying to a specified area). Clause 34(3) is a similar provision excluding any form of...

4. Taylor v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...DATE OF DECISION: 20 October 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 [1] In 2014, while in prison, Arthur Taylor sent a letter to Brian Hunter. The letter was withheld by the Department of Corrections (Corrections). Mr Taylor requested that the letter be returned to him, however this request was refused by Corrections. Mr Taylor complained to the Privacy Commissioner. The Privacy Commissioner concluded there was a breach of information privacy principle (IPP) 6 a...

5. KE Ltd v BO Ltd [2020] NZDT 1536 (18 June 2020) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...necessary repairs to pass a COF check. 2. KE claims that BO kept delaying making a decision about the repairs, and became difficult to contact. On 12 February 2019, KE emailed BO stating “Your vehicle is now impacting our business”, and attaching formal notice that it would start charging a parking fee from the next day of $150.00 plus GST per day. The email and attached notice both ended, “To avoid further penalties, please contact us immediately.” BO did not respond to that emai...

6. IO v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 59 (13 February 2024) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...on or before 5pm on 13 March 2024. If he does not collect the car D Ltd can dispose of it in any manner it sees fit but IO is not entitled to a refund. Referee: K O’Shea Date: 13 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. NT v ND & Ors [2023] NZDT 751 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Ltd has agreed to leave the offer made to NT during the hearing on the table as a gesture of goodwill, I order that R Ltd is liable to pay her $5,000.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 19 December 2023 Page 7 of 7 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. KT & OX & SX v P Ltd [2021] NZDT 1614 (4 August 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...pipe that has had to be repaired. The Applicants claim compensation from P for their costs, but do not claim the cost of the new pump motor. 3. The Applicants claim from P damages of $6,200.80 (the Applicants had claimed $6,301.46 on the claim form, but reduced their claim at the hearing), calculated as follows: • $336.19, for the cost of repairing the damaged pipes • $945.39, being a refund of the double-charge regarding the one/three-phase cable (reduced from $1,046.05) �...

9. FD v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1714 (23 December 2021) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...Omissions 4.1 The Client acknowledges and accepts that the Contractor shall, without prejudice, accept no liability in respect of any alleged or actual error(s) and/or omission(s); (a) resulting from an inadvertent mistake made by the Contractor in the formation and/or administration of this Contract; and/or (b) contained in/omitted from any literature (hard copy and/or electronic) supplied by the Contractor in respect of the Works” 17. B Ltd discovered that it had made a mistake in...

10. Fox-Warren v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment injury/Revocation of Cover) [2025] NZACC 116 (16 July 2025) [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...address the ongoing pain in her tooth. Mr Goga observed that Ms Fox-Warren had recently had a root canal and diagnosed the pain as “chronic apical periodontitis associated with tooth 17”. Dr Goga did not observe signs of a facture. Dr Goga performed a further root canal. [3] On 12 April 2021, Dr Paul Scott, Dentist, treated a fracture in Ms Fox-Warren’s tooth. [4] On 4 August 2021, Dr Scott filled Ms Fox-Warren’s tooth 17. [5] On 1 February 2022, Ms Fox-Warren’s toot...