Search Results

Search results for claim form.

9626 items matching your search terms

  1. OT v KD [2024] NZDT 49 (15 February 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

    ...car was $4,339.61. Together with towing and storage costs, J Ltd’s loss totals $15,896.78. That is the sum, therefore, that KD must pay to J Ltd. Referee: C Hawes Date: 15 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  2. EL v MN [2023] NZDT 738 (14 December 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...K Ltd has confirmed that the cost ordered is to be paid to K Ltd who will reimburse EL for his excess. For that reason the total costs are to be paid to K Ltd. Referee: W Lang Date: 14 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  3. LC v DH Ltd & QH Ltd [2021] NZDT 1667 (11 October 2021) [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...her with her window problems. Section 43 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 allows costs to be awarded in limited circumstances, none of which apply here. Referee: L Thompson Date: 11 October 2021 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

  4. [2022] NZACC 83 – Stryder v ACC (10 May 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...issuing a new decision approving cover for Mr Stryder’s finger injury. [13] On 14 April 2021, ACC issued a new decision accepting cover for a left finger sprain and a left finger fracture. [14] The letter of 14 April 2021 explained that ACC had requested the X-ray from Dr Sharr that the appellant had advised was taken, and on the basis of that X-ray, on balance, ACC was supportive of causation. The letter went on to say that ACC could help the appellant with some of the costs r...

  5. SN & FN v U Ltd [2022] NZDT 260 (21 December 2022) [pdf, 121 KB]

    ...that any entitlement that U Ltd may otherwise have had to interest is appropriately off- set against SN and FN costs prior to bringing the dispute to the Tribunal. Referee Perfect Date: 21 December 2022 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

  6. Hawke v ACC [2013] NZACA 5 [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...the Accident Compensation Act 1982 for the Authority to grant the application as a separate appeal process and, in line with the procedure under the High Court Rules, leave should not be granted until the findings of fact necessary to give an informed answer on jurisdiction are determined in the substantive appeal decision. [8] Alternatively, when the facts of the case are considered under ss 363 and 365 of the transitional provisions of the 2001 Act, as an application for back d...

  7. [2008] NZEmpC WC 17/08 Witcombe v Clerk of the House of Representatives [pdf, 219 KB]

    ...notes of a telephone conversation on the following day between the Clerk-Assistant and Crown counsel, Mrs Roanna Chan, about the matter. [23] On the following day, 18 September, the Clerk-Assistant e-mailed Crown Law “a refined draft” with a request that the earlier draft document be disregarded. I refer to this as the second preliminary draft. It appears that the plaintiff was then unaware of these interactions between the Clerk and Crown Law but it is not surprising that the...

  8. LE v BI [2024] NZDT 31 (2 February 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

    ...being the address LE obtained for him from the 2023 electoral roll. I therefore went ahead with the hearing without BI because a Respondent is not obliged to attend the hearing of a claim made against them. This decision is based on the evidence and information before me in accordance with s42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. Issues 4. The issues I need to determine are: (a) Did BI make a representation to LE about the Baby Carrier and, if so, was LE induced by the representatio...

  9. HX v RC [2019] NZDT 1215 (17 May 2019) [pdf, 159 KB]

    ...at settlement in October 2015, some of which has since been paid to City Council and some of which is not yet due. Issues [4] The issues to determine are: • Was the Home Programme information disclosed to Mr HX prior to the contract being formed? • Is Mr RC in breach of the vendor’s warranty at clause 6.2(3) of the sale and purchase agreement? • Is Mr RC in breach of the vendor’s warranty at clause 6.1(1) of the sale and purchase agreement? Was the Home Programme...

  10. IT v LL [2023] NZDT 620 (2 November 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...successful. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 13. For these reasons the claim is dismissed and no order for enforcement is made. Referee: K Johnson Date: 02 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...