Search Results

1. TT v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 753 (5 December 2023) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...Page 2 of 3 I note that at the rehearing hearing N Ltd offered to continue working with TT to address the remaining outstanding issues with the property. Referee: Kaho - DTR Date: 5 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. FC v DN [2024] NZDT 40 (11 January 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...discussions with FC. I am satisfied that C was born about December 2018 and was therefore approaching 5 years of age at the time FC purchased him. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Thursday, 11 January 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

3. UH v QT Ltd [2024] NZDT 115 (8 April 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...find that the $95.00 fee is payable. An order is therefore made for non liability for all amounts over the $95.00 charge. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Monday, 8 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. Q Ltd v AH [2024] NZDT 809 (20 September 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...the remedial cost as claimed. 11. For the reasons above, I order that AH is to pay Q Ltd the sum of $30,000.00 immediately. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: DJ Dwyer Date: 20 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. IT v UO [2021] NZDT 1578 (11 August 2021) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...amount originally claimed was only $2,150.00 for this item, I find that he can only recover $2,150.00. 11. The total sum payable is therefore $2,568.10. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 11 August 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

6. NO v Council [2020] NZDT 1474 (9 December 2020) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...added. There is therefore insufficient evidence for me to decide that it is more likely than not that chlorine caused NO’s cylinder to fail when it did. Referee: R Merrett Date: 9 December 2020 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. UH v EN [2022] NZDT 155 (13 October 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...that he was acting in trade in the sale and UH accepted that. 9. Because I can find no breach of any legal duty by EN, the claim is therefore dismissed. Referee: M Wilson Date: 13 October 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

8. BT Ltd v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 131 (8 September 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...claim must therefore be struck out from the Disputes Tribunal pending a determination of the ERA on whether this is an employment dispute. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 8 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

9. SI v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 226 (26 April 2023) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...foot during his job as a plumber. He visited a podiatrist over a number of months and carried on working as best he could. 2. The injury did not improve and by September 2021 he was terminated from his employment – he acknowledges that his performance had been significantly affected by the injury. He attempted to replace his income as best he could during the lockdown at that time and in the months beyond. 3. In August 2022 SI made contact with B Ltd to enquire about lodging a...

10. K Ltd v SG [2023] NZDT 211 (23 May 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...that period, she is liable to pay for them. [3] SG said that she herself had never had a contract with T Ltd, which had contracted with the company and provided its services to the company. She said that that all creditors of the company had been informed at some point of the removal of the company from the Register, but was unable to say when T Ltd learned of it. She did not consider that she was liable for what was, in her view, a company debt. She acknowledged that she had continued f...