Search Results

1. MB & NB v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 99 (10 March 2023) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...investigate and determine the issues with the system. The amount claimed was not disputed by OP. 17. I therefore find G Ltd liable to pay the amount claimed. Referee: R Merrett Date: 10 March 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

2. I Ltd v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 71 (10 February 2023) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...mechanic reinstalled the old pump and found the gearbox to be leaking from the input shaft. 5. I Ltd inspected and discovered the pump was not bi-rotational and was not suitable for CI’s truck. I Ltd claims that KN gave misleading and incorrect information about the pump, that I Ltd relied on that information, and the CI truck was damaged as a result. I Ltd claims under the provisions of the Fair Trading Act. 6. I Ltd has paid $5,143.431 to L Ltd to remedy the damage, and supplied...

3. EO v UO & U Ltd [2023] NZDT 257 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...Tribunal proceedings, pursuant to section 43 Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. Therefore, EO’s claim for reimbursement of the filing fee of $180.00 is dismissed. Referee: C Price Date: 30 June 2023 Page 4 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

4. QQ v IK & YM [2023] NZDT 357 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...repairs. Even if QQ had proven that a misrepresentation occurred, his proof of quantum is virtually non-existent, and any order made would have reflected this. Referee: J P Smith Date: 22 June 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

5. MN v EX [2024] NZDT 68 (23 February 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...reasonable to compensate EX for the breach of contract by MN. This sum is to be taken out of the deposit held by EX and the balance is to be paid to MN. Referee: R Merrett Date: 23 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. AA v BB [2024] NZDT 80 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...claim and BB did not attend to present his counterclaim, it is not necessary to determine the third issue. 15. The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Referee: G.M. Taylor Date: 26 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. SI v HD Ltd [2023] NZDT 58 (25 January 2023) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...not have been included as income. However, I do not discount the overall findings of the report that HD Ltd’s affordability assessment was correct at the time the loan was made and some responsibility lies with SI in providing full and accurate information when applying for a loan. 24. In hindsight SI could have well benefited from SM’s obvious skills and assistance prior to applying for the loan. 25. While I acknowledge that SM does not accept FSCL’s reasoning, and consider...

8. Form 4 Criminal legal aid [pdf, 372 KB]

   Templates V13 – November 2017 page 1 11/17 form 4 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Court type District Court High Court Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Description of proceedings Administration Case Review Case management...

9. LCRO 117/2017 LA v KB (11 December 2019) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 17 November 2016. He said he did so in his capacity as a trustee of the NB Trust, whose interests he said were “creditors” in the liquidator’s claim against the Council. [14] He requested an investigation into Mr BAK’s “fee and its structure” which he said was unfair to him, and to the public at large. He sought a refund of the fees charged by Mr BAK, and disciplinary sanction by way of a fine against Mr BAK....

10. KG v OAU [2022] NZDT 225 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...had pulled over to change its tyre. KG said the pothole caused extensive damage to not only his tyre, but also to the rim of the wheel. 2. KG telephoned the police at 1.00pm and E, the contractors who are engaged by OAU to repair the roads, performed a temporary repair by 2.15pm that day. 3. KG claimed to be compensated for the loss that his insurer has not covered, being half of the cost of a new tyre and his excess. 4. The issues to resolve the claim are: (a) Did OAU ow...