Search Results

1. Brown v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 38 KB]

   ...matter needs to go to a full hearing 3. It has been submitted the application concerning Ms Frankland cannot be determined at this juncture. The Tribunal rejects this submission. All relevant matters are before the Tribunal in either affidavit form or in the documents including the sale and purchase agreement. There is nothing to justify the expense of parties continuing in the proceedings if there isn’t sufficient evidence. In this case the fourth respondent was not...

2. [2020] NZEmpC 71 Grigorovich v Precise Ltd [pdf, 344 KB]

   ...factor which generally weighs in favour of the grant of leave. [8] Mr Grigorovich says that he wrote to his representatives on 17 January 2020, following difficulties in extracting a response from them in relation to earlier correspondence. He requested a meeting and one was offered for 24 January 2020. Mr Grigorovich then contacted the Authority. A copy of the determination was emailed to him on 23 January 2020. The email referred to the determination having been issued to...

3. ADD v ZWX [2013] NZDT 190 (15 May 2013) [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...along [road A]. ZWX was turning right from [road B] into [road A]. It was dark at the time of the collision. [2] The intersection is governed by a give way sign on [road B]. Leading into the intersection with [road B], [road A] briefly forms two lanes: one for vehicles turning right into [road B] and another for vehicles travelling straight ahead. Although the turning lane on [road A] is marked, it is not governed by a give way or stop sign. [3] WD and HU Insurance Ltd...

4. [2012] NZCA 508 CA414/2012 Moodie v The Employment Court and Strachan [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...applicant. (b) Ms Strachan was entitled to half of the net profits of the applicant’s practice for the period of her employment together with half of the practice’s bank balance as at 31 January 2006, representing an allowance for work performed by her before that date. (c) The office purchase and rental arrangements were beyond the Employment Court’s jurisdiction. (d) Ms Strachan’s personal grievance was raised within time. (e) Ms Strachan was dismissed constructi...

5. De Malmanche & Ors as Trustees of the Lynette De Malmanche Trust v Auckland Council (successor to the Auckland City Council) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 38 [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...area and the living room, with bedrooms above. The west wall is at the end of the lounge, and the main bedroom is situated at the south west corner towards the back. There is a pagola and tiled area at that end of the building. The south wall forms the back of the house. It faces and is close to a bank cut into the ground to form the flat area on which the house was built. Aspects of each of the elevations were discussed at the hearing. [8] Ms De Malmanche had trouble with...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 1 The alienation of Māori land in Rohe Potae [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Theme Q: The Foreshore, R P Boast © Copyright Waitangi Tribunal 1996 FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present form, it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pu...

7. BO v YL [2015] NZDT 773 (13 April 2015) [pdf, 16 KB]

   ...product. [9] It is of note BB asked BO to provide him with further evidence - two boards (once removed) - to assist him to identify the proximate cause and determine whether the claim can be accepted or declined. I take from this request that BB could not conclude there had been a product failure on the evidence available to him and his report provided interim findings that were subject to further investigation. [10] AA stated that had the product failed he would have...

8. WT Te Manutukutuku Issue 70 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Judge Isaac, the presiding officers, and members of the Tribunal to ensure the work of our unit meets their requirements. Finally, I would also like to acknowledge and thank my colleague Julie Tangaere who, over the past three years, has per­ formed the role of Acting Director for the Unit while also working as Director of the Māori Land Court. Thank you Julie for your leadership of the unit over this time. Kia ora rā. Grace Smit Director  This issue of Te Manu tukutuku...

9. Ratima - Whirinaki 3 (formerly known as Whirinaki No 1 Section 2F2C) (2015) 126 Waiariki MB 73 (126 WAR 73) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...requesting a judicial conference to address matters raised between him the Trust. Those matters relate to land that was formerly the site of Rangatahi College in Murupara. The college was closed on 27 January 2013. [6] The judicial conference, requested by Mr Emery, was held on 5 September 2014. Mr Emery complained that the trust has failed to provide him with information relating to the return of the former school site. During the judicial conference I indicated that a forma...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 117 Johnston v The Fletcher Construction Company Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...is conducting an investigation into possible claims against Fletcher Group Ltd on behalf of some shareholders. Fletcher Construction is part of Fletcher Group. [5] Mayweathers anticipates that documents on the Court’s files may contain information important to its investigation because Mr Johnston was Fletcher Construction’s Financial Controller. Mayweathers understands that an aspect of the claim was about allegations as to the handling of financial information by Fletcher