Search Results

1. GC v U New Zealand [2024] NZDT 280 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...defect, rendering it not fit for the purpose or of acceptable quality, I find the claim must fail and is accordingly dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 17 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. UD v XI Ltd [2024] NZDT 345 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...omission on which the claim is based, and this means that no relief is available under either the Building Act or the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 in this case. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 29 April 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. Lim v Gu-Chang [2014] NZIACDT 77 (29 August 2014) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...to determine: [6.1] Ms Gu-Chang acted unprofessionally and breached the complainant’s right to confidentiality through a publication on her website. [6.2] She overcharged the complainant by charging fees of $12,800 for making a discretionary request for a student visa. [7] The background for the complaint as set out in the Statement of Complaint is: [7.1] The complainant had been in New Zealand without a valid visa since 2007 and in late 2010 he approached Ms Gu-Chang’s practice...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - application for media coverage and guide [pdf, 520 KB]

   ...The following conditions of coverage should apply: (a) Waitangi Tribunal Practice Note Guide to Practice and Procedure section 5:14 (as attached) (b) The presiding officer’s ruling or the Standard Conditions for Media Coverage Applicant information: Applicant’s name On behalf of (media entry) Business address Postal address Email address Telephone number Fax number Signed Date For Office Use Only Approved Declined Name Title Date Signed Waitangi Tribu...

5. NT v ND & Ors [2023] NZDT 751 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Ltd has agreed to leave the offer made to NT during the hearing on the table as a gesture of goodwill, I order that R Ltd is liable to pay her $5,000.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 19 December 2023 Page 7 of 7 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. Te Wini v Askelund (Removal of Second Plaintiff) [2015] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...hearing by Mr Askelund are to be filed and served by 5pm on Friday 16 January 2015. [6.4] The proceedings are to be heard at Auckland on Wednesday 4 February 2015. The venue is Hearing Room 5, Chorus House, 41 Federal Street, Auckland. [8] At the request of Mr Te Wini the timetable was amended in that the date for him to file his written statements of evidence was changed from 9 January 2015 to 20 January 2015 and the date for Mr Askelund to file his written statements consequently cha...

7. KT & OX & SX v P Ltd [2021] NZDT 1614 (4 August 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...pipe that has had to be repaired. The Applicants claim compensation from P for their costs, but do not claim the cost of the new pump motor. 3. The Applicants claim from P damages of $6,200.80 (the Applicants had claimed $6,301.46 on the claim form, but reduced their claim at the hearing), calculated as follows: • $336.19, for the cost of repairing the damaged pipes • $945.39, being a refund of the double-charge regarding the one/three-phase cable (reduced from $1,046.05) �...

8. FD v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1714 (23 December 2021) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...Omissions 4.1 The Client acknowledges and accepts that the Contractor shall, without prejudice, accept no liability in respect of any alleged or actual error(s) and/or omission(s); (a) resulting from an inadvertent mistake made by the Contractor in the formation and/or administration of this Contract; and/or (b) contained in/omitted from any literature (hard copy and/or electronic) supplied by the Contractor in respect of the Works” 17. B Ltd discovered that it had made a mistake in...

9. Fox-Warren v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment injury/Revocation of Cover) [2025] NZACC 116 (16 July 2025) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...address the ongoing pain in her tooth. Mr Goga observed that Ms Fox-Warren had recently had a root canal and diagnosed the pain as “chronic apical periodontitis associated with tooth 17”. Dr Goga did not observe signs of a facture. Dr Goga performed a further root canal. [3] On 12 April 2021, Dr Paul Scott, Dentist, treated a fracture in Ms Fox-Warren’s tooth. [4] On 4 August 2021, Dr Scott filled Ms Fox-Warren’s tooth 17. [5] On 1 February 2022, Ms Fox-Warren’s toot...

10. HM v F [2023] NZDT 445 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...31 December 2022 without giving her any warning? b) If so, what is HM’s loss? Has F breached its contract with HM by cancelling her 115,189 Points on 31 December 2022 without giving her any warning? 4. Parties to a contract must perform their respective obligations. If they do not, they will be in breach and need to account for any loss caused to the other party to the contract. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 5. HM refers to F’s customary practice of sending...