Search Results

1. Q Ltd v AH [2024] NZDT 809 (20 September 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...the remedial cost as claimed. 11. For the reasons above, I order that AH is to pay Q Ltd the sum of $30,000.00 immediately. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: DJ Dwyer Date: 20 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. IT v UO [2021] NZDT 1578 (11 August 2021) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...amount originally claimed was only $2,150.00 for this item, I find that he can only recover $2,150.00. 11. The total sum payable is therefore $2,568.10. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 11 August 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

3. NO v Council [2020] NZDT 1474 (9 December 2020) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...added. There is therefore insufficient evidence for me to decide that it is more likely than not that chlorine caused NO’s cylinder to fail when it did. Referee: R Merrett Date: 9 December 2020 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. UH v EN [2022] NZDT 155 (13 October 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...that he was acting in trade in the sale and UH accepted that. 9. Because I can find no breach of any legal duty by EN, the claim is therefore dismissed. Referee: M Wilson Date: 13 October 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. BT Ltd v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 131 (8 September 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...claim must therefore be struck out from the Disputes Tribunal pending a determination of the ERA on whether this is an employment dispute. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 8 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. SI v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 226 (26 April 2023) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...foot during his job as a plumber. He visited a podiatrist over a number of months and carried on working as best he could. 2. The injury did not improve and by September 2021 he was terminated from his employment – he acknowledges that his performance had been significantly affected by the injury. He attempted to replace his income as best he could during the lockdown at that time and in the months beyond. 3. In August 2022 SI made contact with B Ltd to enquire about lodging a...

7. K Ltd v SG [2023] NZDT 211 (23 May 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...that period, she is liable to pay for them. [3] SG said that she herself had never had a contract with T Ltd, which had contracted with the company and provided its services to the company. She said that that all creditors of the company had been informed at some point of the removal of the company from the Register, but was unable to say when T Ltd learned of it. She did not consider that she was liable for what was, in her view, a company debt. She acknowledged that she had continued f...

8. BU v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 427 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...referred to guidelines published by [Company] in support of her position. In contrast Q Ltd argued that a conduit was not required, and that it had met the minimum standards required by [Company]. 6. I accept that there is some inconsistency in the information given by [Company]. Each party relies on an email from a [Company] representative, supporting their position. They have both also referred to guidance published by [Company]. BU presented a booklet entitled “[redacted]” in w...

9. LN & QH v KA & Ors [2025] NZDT 69 (11 March 2025) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...reaches the age of 18, has left school, and possibly until he has any ability to pay. As stated above, his parents are not responsible for his debt. Hannan DTR Disputes Tribunal Referee 11 March 2025 Page 3 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

10. DU & HU c/- V Trust v UT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1591 (28 July 2021) [pdf, 105 KB]

    ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 5. DU and HU attended today’s hearing at the [City] Court. UT did not attend, but I am satisfied that it was correctly served with the claim and the notice of hearing. This order is based on the evidence and information before me, as permitted by s42(1) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. Issues 6. The issues I need to decide are: (a) Are DU and HU entitled to compensation for the cost of repairing the wall? (b) Are DU and HU entitled to c...