Search Results

1. LT Ltd v ON & NN [2022] NZDT 137 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 137 APPLICANT EB APPLICANT LT Ltd RESPONDENT ON SECOND RESPONDENT NN The Tribunal orders: 1. EB has been removed as an Applicant in this claim. 2. ON and NN are to pay $200.00 to LT Ltd before 15 August 2022. Reasons. 1. EB has been removed as an Applicant in this claim at her request, as the contract was between LT Ltd and ON and NN. 2. ON and NN rented a storage u...

2. Te Manutukutuku Issue 16 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...justice-delivery mechanisms. The circumstances allow the CCJwp to start from a position of strength, as confirmed by the positive results to date. Maori Grievances and the Private Land Issue Following is an extract from the speech given by John Kneebone, a former president of Federated Farmers, at the Federated Farmers annual conference in May. Mr Kneebone was not speaking as a member of the Waitangi Tribunal. I believe I am here because of your concerns and fears for the security o...

3. [2019] NZEmpC 166 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...difficulties were seen to be associated with this process. On 8 December 2015, the Authority, in consultation with the parties, released the Clarkes from their witness summonses and directed them to instead provide affidavits listing which documents requested by the plaintiff they had within their control. They were to categorise them as “in scope”, “privileged”, “confidential, or “out of scope”. This process was analogous to the process for non-party disclosure cont...

4. [2022] NZACC 67 – KC v ACC (27 April 2022) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...[Mental injury caused by criminal acts, s 21 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue is a decision of the Accident Compensation Corporation dated 21 January 2020 declining a claim for cover for mental injuries suffered as a result of sexual abuse. [2] The appellant submits that she has suffered mental injury and is entitled to cover. [3] The Corporation submits that the criteria of s 21 is not satisfied by...

5. KB & PB v VI Ltd & OQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 144 (16 August 2022) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...Disputes Tribunal Act 1988). Conclusion 12. For these reasons VI Ltd is to pay [the applicants] the sum of $8,226.74 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 16 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. TH v TU [2022] NZDT 237 (7 December 2022) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...attempt to resolve their dispute between themselves. However, if they have been unable to do so, they are entitled to pursue these matters elsewhere. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 7 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. SB v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 55 (8 February 2023) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...be repainted every year. 19. For these reasons, I do not need to consider the remaining issue of remedy. 20. For these reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Johnson Date: 08 February 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. ET & DT v CP Ltd [2022] NZDT 222 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...unreasonable or significant cost on ET and DT. 14. I therefore find that the responsibility for the collection of the cabin from ET and DT lies with CP Ltd. Referee: R Merrett Date: 29 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

9. UL v TS [2024] NZDT 302 (27 March 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...damage UL’s vehicle and therefore, she is not liable for any damage it suffered. 17. Given this conclusion it is not necessary to consider the other issues. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 27 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. LZ v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 174 (22 May 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...I am satisfied that while the gift cards were promotional offers as part of the deal to entice customers, they were not contractual in nature because there was no “consideration” or money paid for their purchase. Because the gift cards did not form part of the contract for the drone and product care, there can be no breach of a contract for failing to return the value of the cards as requested. 12. I further take into account that the promotional cards are called “gift cards” wh...