Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11435 items matching your search terms

  1. UH v QT Ltd [2024] NZDT 115 (8 April 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...find that the $95.00 fee is payable. An order is therefore made for non liability for all amounts over the $95.00 charge. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Monday, 8 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

  2. Q Ltd v AH [2024] NZDT 809 (20 September 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...the remedial cost as claimed. 11. For the reasons above, I order that AH is to pay Q Ltd the sum of $30,000.00 immediately. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: DJ Dwyer Date: 20 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

  3. Wright v Ngamoki-Cameron - Heretatua (manu on the Tītī Island of Taukihepa) [2015] Chief Judge's MB 108 (2015 CJ 108) [pdf, 475 KB]

    ...to the request for an extension on the basis that the Ngamoki whānau are part of the Te Au whānau, who were notified of the previous s 45 application and are aware of the nature of the dispute surrounding Heretatua. An urgent hearing date was requested. [23] On 22 November 2012, the Court gave the parties until 28 February 2013 to file responses. 14 Further responses were received from Richard Wixon on behalf of Ngā Uri o Te Au objecting to Mrs Wright’s application, and Mr...

  4. Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 364 KB]

    ................................................. 19 Improper piecing-in of fibre-cement sheet backing ............................................. 19 Poor corner jointing of cement board cladding ................................................... 19 Poorly formed junctions of the cladding at the base of the cladding ................... 19 Fibre cement sheets fixed hard back against masonry foundation lacking required clearances ............................................................

  5. Zhong v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 32 [pdf, 264 KB]

    ...Crowe‟s evidence is based on invasive testing and none of the other experts concur with Dr Walls. Liability for the apron flashing defects [30] The panel of experts was asked to give their opinion on whether the apron flashings were formed correctly, the stage of construction when kick- outs should have been formed and the trade responsible. All experts agreed that the apron flashings were required to be installed with sufficient length to enable a diverter to be craft...

  6. Form-203-Filing-a-new-address-1-July-2025.pdf [pdf, 335 KB]

    ...issued to a bailiff to attempt service • the summons or warrant has not been able to be actioned and you have been asked to supply a new address • you can provide an alternative address for the judgment debtor. How much does it cost to make a request? The fee is $67. The court can order the judgment debtor to repay the fee, provided that a maximum of one fee only is added to the judgment debt. You can only use this form to file one address for one debtor. If you have more than one...

  7. BD Ltd v QC Inc [2022] NZDT 162 (10 October 2022) [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...boxes in the building to the letterbox of the newly appointed Commodore, UM. 5. BD Ltd’s invoice to QC Inc for the Manager’s fee and catering services amounting to a total of $662.50 was not paid, on the basis that BB had failed to provide information and services required by QC Inc and, as a result QC Inc has incurred cost and spent time resolving matters. Since lodging this Tribunal claim, QC Inc has paid $162.50 for catering services. BD Ltd seeks payment of the $500 monthly fe...

  8. EI v CT [2021] NZDT 1703 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...timely services. 4. The issues I must decide are: a. Was the work done as contracted? b. If so, is EI entitled to $603.75 as claimed, or any other sum? Was the work done as contracted? 5. Under contract law, a legally binding contract is formed when both parties intend to contract on agreed terms and intend for those terms to be legally binding. The terms of a contract are formed at the beginning, not at the end, and what was agreed is looked at objectively, i.e., by looking at...

  9. JD v SL [2023] NZDT 364 (20 July 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...$280.00 for towing the car away from the scene of the collision. She explained that this figure had been off-set by what had been recovered for the sale of the wreck, which [towing company] had overseen. 16. However, JD was able to get further information from [towing company] during the hearing. This indicated that the towing fee was $920.00, and the sale of the wreck was $1,300.00. This means JD did not have to pay anything for towing the car, but instead received $380.00 from [to...

  10. SS & YO v SR [2024] 36 (29 February 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...the current claim. 31. For these reasons I find the claim is partially proved and the respondent is to pay the applicant the sum of $5,374.08. Referee: K Johnson Date: 29 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...