Search Results

1. N Ltd v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 191 (12 March) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...further work was required to be done to complete Stage 2 after N Ltd invoiced on 18 March 2023, differ significantly. 12. D Ltd contend that there were significant quality issues in the work completed by N Ltd and they submitted evidence in the form of texts from their site manager, X, to N Ltd, and also an invoice for remedial work from the building contractor, S Ltd (‘S LTD’). S Ltd was engaged to complete Block I when D Ltd cancelled N Ltd’s contract. The texts from X to N L...

2. [2022] NZIACDT 19 – TA v Tian (Sanctions) (25 July 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...Following a number of successful student and visitor visa applications, a student visa application lodged on 11 October 2016 was unsuccessful. Ms Tian did not inform the complainant of the decline. She then lodged student visa applications and s 61 requests from 24 November 2016 until 1 March 2017, all without instructions from the complainant or his mother and without telling them of the outcome of any application. [8] On 8 June 2017, Ms Tian filed an expression of interest on...

3. Buckland v Accident Compensation Corporation (Cover) [2023] NZACC 151 [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...fund hip replacement surgery. [2] The appellant also appeals against ACC’s decision of 23 July 2020 suspending the appellant’s entitlements. Background [3] The Corporation’s decisions at issue in this appeal were made in respect of a claim for injuries resulting from an accident on 3 July 2019 when the appellant stepped into a hole in a rock wall and twisted his right leg and hurt his back. [4] The claim form completed on 10 July 2019 notes “sprain hip/thigh” and “lu...

4. QB v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 243 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...breached the FTA because the discounts it offered on particular services were less than prices it had quoted or advertised for those services. 24. QB says that she was entitled to rely on T Ltd’s brochure price for a helicopter ride, and emailed information about the cost of accommodation, as being a representation of the discount that would be offered on her wedding package if she did not opt for those items in her wedding package. 25. I have already found above that T Ltd’s g...

5. Te Manutukutuku Issue 16 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...justice-delivery mechanisms. The circumstances allow the CCJwp to start from a position of strength, as confirmed by the positive results to date. Maori Grievances and the Private Land Issue Following is an extract from the speech given by John Kneebone, a former president of Federated Farmers, at the Federated Farmers annual conference in May. Mr Kneebone was not speaking as a member of the Waitangi Tribunal. I believe I am here because of your concerns and fears for the security o...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 99 Broughton v Microsoft NZ Ltd [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...defendant Judgment: 8 August 2011, recalled and re-issued 10 August 2011 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] This interlocutory judgment determines the defendant’s objection to disclosure and inspection of certain documents as requested by the plaintiff, and associated issues. [2] The procedure that has led to this hearing, and the need to depart significantly from the statutory scheme for disclosure and inspection of documents under the Employment Cour...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 102 Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education Ltd t/a Morningstar Preschool [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...filed her costs memorandum. The defendant did not. On the morning of 4 June 2013, Mr Pa’u for the defendant apologised for the failure and asked for an extension of time until 6 June 2013. No reason was given for the failure or the need to request an extension. It would have been helpful if the request for extension had been made on 31 May. In the event, because I would have retired 1 [2013] NZEmpC 82. by 6 June, I d...

8. LT Ltd v ON & NN [2022] NZDT 137 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 137 APPLICANT EB APPLICANT LT Ltd RESPONDENT ON SECOND RESPONDENT NN The Tribunal orders: 1. EB has been removed as an Applicant in this claim. 2. ON and NN are to pay $200.00 to LT Ltd before 15 August 2022. Reasons. 1. EB has been removed as an Applicant in this claim at her request, as the contract was between LT Ltd and ON and NN. 2. ON and NN rented a storage u...

9. KB & PB v VI Ltd & OQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 144 (16 August 2022) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...Disputes Tribunal Act 1988). Conclusion 12. For these reasons VI Ltd is to pay [the applicants] the sum of $8,226.74 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 16 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. TH v TU [2022] NZDT 237 (7 December 2022) [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...attempt to resolve their dispute between themselves. However, if they have been unable to do so, they are entitled to pursue these matters elsewhere. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 7 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...