Search Results

1. Q Ltd v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 659 (30 November 2023) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...therefore dismissed. 36. For these reasons, I award damages of $16,339.20 to the Applicant, which the Respondent is to pay by the date set out in the order. Referee: A Chand Date: 30 November 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

2. BN v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 682 (26 August 2024) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...22 December 2023 BN incorporated a company, [Company B]. 7. The text messages recommenced on 20 January 2024, as follows (BN is AM and Mr L is RM): 20 January BN to Mr L: Re [Company A] Lease Finalisation for February 2024. Please call for formalise. Thanks. 22 January BN to Mr L: BN, I am on leave at present. I will be in [Town] on Wednesday for a meeting with the directors, I will confirm their acceptance then. 24 January BN to Mr L: Any progress re [Company A] lease ple...

3. GO & KO v MD [2025] NZDT 10 (16 April 2025) [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...ownership. 5. To the extent that the Tribunal can make such a direction, the Tribunal directs Crown Law Trust of the New Zealand Government to refund to GO the sum of $450.00 that she paid into the [redacted] Court on 28 November 2022. 6. GO’ claim for a refund of the civil enforcement fee she paid to the Ministry of Justice ($600.00) is struck out because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to make such an order. 7. MD’s counterclaim is dismissed. REASONS 1. Th...

4. LCRO 239/2016 RY v P AN and T AN (25 September 2018) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...undertaking” provided by the builder’s lawyer, and secondly, “to seek clarification …[which] resulted in [Mr and Mrs AN] being given inaccurate assurances” by Mr RY concerning the deposit paid by them. [17] The Committee declined Mr and Mrs AN’s request for compensation because “there was always going to be an added cost component” to the purchase due to the insolvency of the builder. However, “in recognition of the additional expense and unnecessary stress incurr...

5. TRA - Notice of claim [pdf, 354 KB]

   Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals TRA 29/24 - 1 TRA no: Notice of Claim In the Taxation Review Authority In the Matter of [Specify the appropriate Act(s), for example the Income Tax Act 2004, the Income Tax Act 2007, or the Goods and Services Tax Act 1985] Between [Full name, address, and occupation] Disputant And The Commissioner of Inland Revenue Defendant Notice of Claim Dated: Agent If you are being represented by an agent (for example,...

6. FD, GN, LN, UT, NE, & NP v BQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 165 (18 October 2022) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...tickets, the applicants would have been able to claim the refund whatever the weather was on the day, with mountain travel still limited for guided tours that day. BQ added the DOC limitation information to the website after the applicant’s requested a refund. That is what should have been on the website from the start. 4. I have not ordered a refund of the booking fee on the basis that the booking fee would not have been refunded if refundable tickets were held....

7. Gough-Pataua 4B (2011) 19 Taitokerau MB 1 (19 TTK 1) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...Faith Taha Whanau Trust. They also claim areas within Haukapua. Title history [8] The dispute over ―rights‖ to different parts of the land stems largely from disputed claims about which tupuna lived where, in large part when the land was in former titles. A basic understanding of the title history is therefore necessary. 19 Taitokerau MB 3 [9] Title to the Pataua block of 339 acres was first investigated and determined on 20 September 1877. 1 Ownership was determined in...

8. BD & NL v CM Ltd t-a HD [2021] NZDT 1669 (14 October 2021) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...cookers) from TT based in [City], Australia, and the shipment was sent straight to IN from China. HI says he left IN in February 2013 to set up HD through CM and he took the remaining (approximately 67) [Brand] cookers with him. Based on the available information, I am satisfied that CM distributed the [Brand 1] cookers in New Zealand and is therefore the manufacturer of the Cooker under s12 of the CGA. 11. The Applicants say that they could not get the Cooker repaired or obtain a repl...

9. DD v SQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 72 (31 January 2022) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...have included SQ’s goodwill offer to DD. SQ left this offer open at the hearing. 16. These are the merits and justice of the case. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Monday, 31 January 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

10. GA v IX [2025] NZDT 236 (17 June 2025) [pdf, 219 KB]

    ...cancellation and changes to the tickets, or that he has received or benefitted from a refund from [airline company], the claim against him is accordingly dismissed. K Edwards Disputes Tribunal Referee 17 June 2025 Page 3 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to app...