Search Results

1. QB v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 243 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...breached the FTA because the discounts it offered on particular services were less than prices it had quoted or advertised for those services. 24. QB says that she was entitled to rely on T Ltd’s brochure price for a helicopter ride, and emailed information about the cost of accommodation, as being a representation of the discount that would be offered on her wedding package if she did not opt for those items in her wedding package. 25. I have already found above that T Ltd’s g...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 166 GEA Process Engineering Ltd v Schicker [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...difficulties were seen to be associated with this process. On 8 December 2015, the Authority, in consultation with the parties, released the Clarkes from their witness summonses and directed them to instead provide affidavits listing which documents requested by the plaintiff they had within their control. They were to categorise them as “in scope”, “privileged”, “confidential, or “out of scope”. This process was analogous to the process for non-party disclosure cont...

3. [2022] NZACC 67 – KC v ACC (27 April 2022) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...[Mental injury caused by criminal acts, s 21 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue is a decision of the Accident Compensation Corporation dated 21 January 2020 declining a claim for cover for mental injuries suffered as a result of sexual abuse. [2] The appellant submits that she has suffered mental injury and is entitled to cover. [3] The Corporation submits that the criteria of s 21 is not satisfied by...

4. Te Manutukutuku Issue 16 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...justice-delivery mechanisms. The circumstances allow the CCJwp to start from a position of strength, as confirmed by the positive results to date. Maori Grievances and the Private Land Issue Following is an extract from the speech given by John Kneebone, a former president of Federated Farmers, at the Federated Farmers annual conference in May. Mr Kneebone was not speaking as a member of the Waitangi Tribunal. I believe I am here because of your concerns and fears for the security o...

5. Mollett v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Weekly Entitlement and Delay) [2023] NZACC 112 [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...refer her for a SPECT CT scan of her back, to look for ongoing inflammation in her facet joints. Dr Armstrong said that, if the bone scan was negative, he would look into her hip as a possible source of her pain. Dr Armstrong stated that he had requested that Ms Mollet’s hip be added to her ACC claim. Dr Armstrong certified Ms Mollet as unfit for work until 1 July 2020. [25] On 29 May 2020, the Corporation asked Dr Armstrong to provide a READ code and side regarding his reques...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 99 Broughton v Microsoft NZ Ltd [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...defendant Judgment: 8 August 2011, recalled and re-issued 10 August 2011 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] This interlocutory judgment determines the defendant’s objection to disclosure and inspection of certain documents as requested by the plaintiff, and associated issues. [2] The procedure that has led to this hearing, and the need to depart significantly from the statutory scheme for disclosure and inspection of documents under the Employment Cour...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 102 Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education Ltd t/a Morningstar Preschool [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...filed her costs memorandum. The defendant did not. On the morning of 4 June 2013, Mr Pa’u for the defendant apologised for the failure and asked for an extension of time until 6 June 2013. No reason was given for the failure or the need to request an extension. It would have been helpful if the request for extension had been made on 31 May. In the event, because I would have retired 1 [2013] NZEmpC 82. by 6 June, I d...

8. LT Ltd v ON & NN [2022] NZDT 137 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 137 APPLICANT EB APPLICANT LT Ltd RESPONDENT ON SECOND RESPONDENT NN The Tribunal orders: 1. EB has been removed as an Applicant in this claim. 2. ON and NN are to pay $200.00 to LT Ltd before 15 August 2022. Reasons. 1. EB has been removed as an Applicant in this claim at her request, as the contract was between LT Ltd and ON and NN. 2. ON and NN rented a storage u...

9. GD v TN & NN [2025] NZDT 92 (5 May 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...publication. The estimate was $9,625. The email stated: I have prepared an estimate to complete the processing of [The memoir] including printing. The attached is an estimate only as a lot depends on your preferences during the layout and formatting stage as we send various options to you. I don’t have sufficient information at this stage to include a print quote because that depends on the number of copies required, whether you want them hard-bound or soft- bound, etc. 4...

10. [2021] NZACC 141 – LM v ACC (20 September 2021) [pdf, 170 KB]

    ...accordance with the dates therein. The application would then be dealt with on the papers. [3] Submissions in support, in opposition and, in reply have been filed. 1 LM v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZACC 145. Background [4] Two claims were determined by Judge Sinclair in her judgment of October 2020. They concern review claims brought by the applicant in respect of decisions made by the respondent under ACR 273/19 and ACR 191/18. ACR 273/19 [5] The applicant...