Search Results

1. E Ltd & W Ltd v TN [2024] NZDT 712 (30 August 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...foreseeable expenses and so are recoverable. 13. I am satisfied that the amount claimed by W Ltd is the correct amount to be paid by TN, which is $18,119.50. Referee: M Wilson Date: 30 August 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

2. DB v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 325 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...outside of jurisdiction or unnecessarily prolonged proceedings. As none of these exceptions apply in this case the applicant’s claim for costs is dismissed. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 16 April 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. TQ & MQ v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 460 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...infrastructure and to service growth in the long term. 8. TA, General Manager of H Ltd, stated a Development Contribution is not charged to all new builds, and that they were unaware it would be charged when this contract was entered into. However information provided by the Council and on their website states they can provide an estimate of the Development Contribution at the planning stage, and that the contribution is assessed when the Building Consent is granted. I therefore find t...

4. TU v EN & C Ltd [2024] NZDT 479 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...provided, and in any event, such work would be the contractual responsibility of NI Ltd, and not EN personally. This part of the claim therefore does not succeed. Referee Perfect Date: 28 May 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. MC v SH [2020] NZDT 1544 (29 May 2020) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...and MC was required, under the CGA, to give SH the opportunity to remedy the issues. He was unable to do so because of the damage done to the dentures by MC. Referee: R Merrett Date: 29 May 2020 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. BC v ME & PI [2024] NZDT 186 (14 March 2024) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...being a total of $7036.00. What were PI’s reasonable losses and who is liable to pay them? 24. For the reasons already outlined, PI’s claim is dismissed. Referee Perfect Date: 14 March 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. GF Ltd v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 204 (26 April 2023) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...incompetent advice in relation to the ERA matter and/or by providing inadequate representation before the ERA? • If so, is D Ltd liable to pay a refund of all or part of the fees paid for the ERA case? • Is GF Ltd liable to pay damages in the form of an ‘early termination’ fee for GF’s cancellation, in early 2022, of the fixed term contract? Did D Ltd breach its contract with GF Ltd/IU Ltd by providing poor or incompetent advice in relation to the ERA matter and/or by pr...

8. [2021] NZACC 29 - Van Essen v ACC (9 February 2021) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...work from 6 July 2009 for 14 days. [11] On 16 July 2009, Dr Searle recorded “going well”. The appellant was pain free on examination. He concluded that the appellant was fit to return to normal work from 20 July 2009. [12] A further claim for cover was completed on 10 February 2011, when the appellant lifted a 20 kg bag of rubbish into a skip and felt pain in her left chest wall. A similar event is recorded on 8 December 2011, although on that occasion, the appellant h...

9. [2014] NZEmpC 212 Cudby & Meade Ltd v New Zealand Furniture, Manufacturing and Associated Workers’ Union Inc [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...[9] It is not without significance in terms of what has transpired subsequently in this Court that in its determination the Authority also saw fit to make the following observations: [4] During the Authority's investigation meeting I requested Mr Memelink to make arrangements to file the wage time and holiday 6 At [21]. 7 At [16]. 8 At [17]. 9 At [20]. records for Mr Stevens. He has explained this wou...

10. LCRO 130/2017 HS v NC and EH (18 September 2019) [pdf, 260 KB]

    ...September 2015. [5] Mr HS met with the practitioners the following day. They provided to him that day by email a letter of engagement accompanied by information on the principal aspects of client care and service, and terms of engagement. They requested “$1,000 plus GST” in advance of their fees which he paid.1 [6] Mr HS met with the practitioners again a week later, on 24 September 2015. At that meeting he raised with the practitioners his dispute with [hardware store], ab...