Search Results

1. FN v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 496 (5 October 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...unfortunate association that FN made that the [colour] for [diesel brand] product was the same as [petrol brand]. The claim must be dismissed. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Thursday, 5 October 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. Form 26 - Criminal legal aid -Tax invoice - schedules H & I [pdf, 421 KB]

   Templates V10 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 26 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim...

3. LAP contract for services [pdf, 753 KB]

   ...comply with the procedure in the relevant policy, including any requirements to inform the Secretary and find a replacement. 5. Secretary’s obligations 5.1. The Secretary will, once the Secretary has all relevant information that has been requested from the Provider, promptly: 5.1.1. make decisions relating to Approvals 5.1.2. objectively and fairly deal with Legal Aid Complaints in accordance with clause 9 of this Contract, the Complaints Management policy in the Provider...

4. Waitangi Tribunal theme Q - Foreshore [pdf, 559 KB]

   ...The earlier cases 3.2. Judge Acheson and the northern foreshore cases 3.3. In re Ninety-Mile Beach 4.0. The law of foreshore ownership: summary and analysis 5.0. Coastal planning: the current legal framwork 6.0. Conclusions and options for reform Bibliography of secondary sources Appendix: Selected Principal Documents 1. Kapanga Parumoana case (1872) 2 Coromandel MB 315-6, and extracts from Daily Southern Cross. 2. Crown Law opinion on foreshore area at Wenderholm. 3. Opi...

5. ED v MA [2023] NZDT 557 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 158 KB]

   Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) RESULT OF APPLICATION FOR REHEARING [2023] NZDT 557 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim ED RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against MA Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Granted The Order of 18 April 2023 is set aside. In due course the parties will be advised of the date and time of the new hearing. Reasons for decision: 1...

6. [2023] NZREADT 23 - ZI v CAC 2107 (17 August 2023).pdf [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...dated 2 July 2023) against the decision of 12 May 2023. It was against the second respondent. In the appeal form, the appellant acknowledged being outside the appeal period of 20 working days. [10] At the same time, the appellant filed a “Request for Extension to Appeal Deadline” (undated). She relevantly states: Upon receiving the decision from the CAC, I wrote to my lawyer to guide me through the appeal process. However, despite multiple attempts to contact my lawyer via...

7. Te Manutukutuku Issue 71 [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...some improvements but was inadequate to settle past griev­ ances and also failed to protect the Muaū poko owners’ rights and inter­ ests in the years that followed. By the 1980s, Muaūpoko had walked out of the domain board, but promised reforms were never made. Perhaps most seriously, the Tri­ bunal found that the Crown’s actions, including its funding decisions, were complicit in the serious pollution and degradation of the lake and the Hōkio Stream. By 2010, Lake Horowhenu...

8. Smith v Waitakere City Council [pdf, 220 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00277 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN SEAN SMITH Claimant AND WAITAKERE CITY COUNCIL First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 30 May & 1 June 2004 Appearances: Sean Smith in person as Claimant Susan Banbury & Georgina Grant for First Respondent Lawrence Ponniah for Second and Fourth Respondents Determination: 12 July 2004...

9. [2010] NZEmpC 154 Villegas v Visypak (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...also a union delegate. His terms and conditions were contained in the Visypak (NZ) Ltd Collective Employment Agreement 2008-2011 (the CA). [4] On 5 September 2008 he received a written warning for an incident on his fork hoist that Visypak claimed should have been reported as a near miss. It found that he had driven across a wet floor in such a manner that he had lost control of the fork hoist, slid sideways and nearly struck a mobile floor scrubber that was being driven by a...

10. Dooney v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2022] NZACC 237 [pdf, 253 KB]

    ...Hearing: 30 November 2022 Held at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: M Williams for the Appellant J Sumner for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment: 7 December 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for personal injury - s 26(2), Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 14 July 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decision...