Search Results

1. [2017] NZEmpC 27 Dent v Waikato DHB [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...interest; (d) disclosure is both unnecessary and undesirable because: (i) the documents are not relevant to the proceedings; (ii) volumes of documentation have already been provided; (iii) the plaintiff has already made extensive disclosure requests; and (iv) the resources required for the defendant to carry out the disclosure would be disproportionate to the requirements of the proceedings. Legal principles [12] Regulation 37 provides that the object of the disclosu...

2. FX & QX v MC Ltd [2022] NZDT 154 (22 September 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...District Court [2022] NZDT 154 APPLICANT FX APPLICANT QX RESPONDENT MC1 Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Claim Dismissed. 2. A copy of this Order is to be sent to SNO, [email address] for his information, as I have been advised that he is another Trustee but has not been named as an applicant to this claim. REASON 3. In 2008 FX & QX entered into a contract with MC2 Ltd, trading under the HK franchise, for MC2 Ltd to build a new...

3. BS v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 70 (27 February 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...adjournment order dated 13 November 2023 sets out the background to the claim. 2. BS submitted that: a. After the first hearing, she looked to file an ACC claim online. She watched a tutorial video which advised the claimant to have “detailed information about the accident ready before filing”. b. She considered that what happened to her was negligence, not an ‘accident’. She telephoned ACC to clarify whether she could still file a claim. c. The person that she spoke...

4. Reekie v Attorney-General (for Department of Corrections) [2022] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...1 [This decision is to be cited as Reekie v Attorney-General [2022] NZHRRT 20.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 20 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Following those events, Mr Reekie prepared an information privacy request seeking a number of documents relating to the 12 March 2012 events and requesting that video footage from that day be retained. Mr Reekie alleges Corrections interfered with his privacy by not responding in a timely manner and in accorda...

5. [2011] NZEmpC 57 Wade v Hume Pack-N-Cool Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...respondent did not make a claim for costs. At that stage the Employment Relations Authority had awarded $1,500 costs against the applicant. This sum had not been paid. Mr Hume’s affidavit complains about the way the applicant has pursued his claims, and in particular the delays and the additional costs that were being incurred. [10] On 28 April 2010, a notice of change of representation and address for service on behalf of the applicant was filed stating that his counsel was n...

6. Widdowson v Bekx [pdf, 166 KB]

   FILE NO: 0092 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN: DAVID JOHN WIDDOWSON & ANGELA PHYLLIS WIDDOWSON Claimant AND: PETER FRANCES BEKX First Respondent AND: DEBBIE ANNE BEKX Second Respondent AND: WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Third Respondent AND IAN M STUART Fourth Respondent (REMOVED) AND STUDORP LTD Fifth Respondent DETERMINATION OF ADJUDICATORS

7. Car & vehicle accident claim tips

   Get some tips to help you make a claim about a car or other vehicle accident. View the story of a car accident dispute Read an example claim form for a vehicle accident dispute Contact details If you think you’ll be making a claim after an accident, contact the person involved and get any of their contact details you don’t already have: name phone number home and business address a PO Box number email address their vehicle details. Other people or organisations involved If the owner of the...

   Located in:

   1. Disputes Tribunal >
   2. How to make a claim

8. Waitangi Tribunal - claim form [pdf, 38 KB]

   Sample Claim Form [Your address] [Date] To: The Registrar Waitangi Tribunal DX SX 11237 Wellington 1. I / We [Insert name(s), address(es), iwi /hapū, am / are Māori]. 2. For ourselves and [Names of any group(s) on whose behalf the claim is made] 3. Claim we have been / are likely to be prejudicially affected by [Describe the actions of the Crown, and detail how those actions have caused prejudice]. 4. And we claim that these matters are contrary to...

9. Rafiq v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2013] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...Cantlon’s opinion, this does not mean that disputed information should be deleted, but rather that the client’s view of the disputed information should be taken into consideration before the information is used. [19.7] The Ministry has received two requests from Mr Rafiq under Principle 7 requesting the correction of personal information. On each occasion the Ministry has not been willing to correct that information in accordance with the request but has attached to the information...

10. HJJ Ltd v RQ [2015] NZDT 1033 (26 November 2015) [pdf, 109 KB]

    ...that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] HJJ Ltd (HJJ) is a debt collection company directed by Mr QJ and owned by his wife RH. Mr QJ was also a director and fifty percent shareholder in JQR Ltd (JQR), which has since been liquidated. [2] HJJ claims that, as at 31 October 2008, a retail paint store trading as HQJ Y Suburb (HQJ) owed $124,541.00 to JQR for the supply of paint. In March 2009, JQR went into liquidation, and HJJ claims that the debt was assigned to JRR Ltd (JRR), an...