Search Results

1. Flutey - Papatupu 2A No 2 (2017) 363 Aotea MB 258 (363 AOT 258) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...discussed at the last hearing. If they wish to make submissions on what if any deductions should be made for the costs of planting and maintaining the forest then they should do so within the timeframe specified, noting the earlier adjournment and the request for submissions then. Evidence in support of any alternative position should also be filed within one month. … [32] Should no response to this direction be received from Mr Parker or his clients then I give notice now that...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 159 X v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...immediately. [14] The defendant considers that the costs it incurred after making the settlement offer were unnecessarily incurred. In February and March 2018, the defendant incurred an additional $29,980.91 in legal fees. The $15,000 uplift requested is, therefore, slightly more than 50 per cent of those fees. [15] The plaintiff acknowledged a settlement offer was made, but disputed the appropriateness of an uplift, because he maintained he was justified in rejecting the offe...

3. Fisher v Fisher - Mura Rattenbury [2013] Chief Judge's MB 272 (2013 CJ 272) [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...the time of the hearing, but that she was never told of their intentions nor that there was any hearing set. There were also other options the Applicant's mother had, as evidenced by the Applicant, to ensure that the Applicant was contacted as requested by the court (e.g through the Applicant's daughter and the other family relations). 14. In light of this, there are sufficient grounds for this matter to proceed to hearing. Recommendation of course of action to be taken 15...

4. LCRO 131/2017 GR v [Area] Standards Committee [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...acknowledges that was a mistake. [15] Mr GR also confirmed that he would pay Ms DS her share in accordance with the undertaking. [16] Mr GR attached copies of various documents, including correspondence: (a) from Mr DH’s lawyer, dated 6 October 2015, requesting the release of $72,500 from the trust account in accordance with an agreement between the owners; and (b) to Mr DH’s lawyer, in which Mr GR requested repayment of the money paid to Mr DH. [17] Mr GR confirmed that...

5. Hide v Official Assignee (Discovery) [2018] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...These proceedings will be heard at Christchurch on 30 April 2018. Three days have been set aside. Mr Hide has now applied for further and better discovery. Background [2] The current pleadings filed by Mr Hide comprise an amended statement of claim dated 19 July 2017 and two statements of evidence. Mr Hide alleges that as a consequence of a breach of information privacy principles 1, 2, 4 and 6 there has been an interference with his privacy by the Official Assignee: [2.1] Prin...

6. Midlane v Woodberg [2013] NZIACDT 31 (27 May 2013) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...point of contact in New Zealand, which was the company he had engaged. [17] The importance of this instruction was made clear to Ms Anderson. [18] Ms Anderson advised on the appropriate investor category under which Mr A should apply and the information required to prepare and lodge an “Expression of Interest” form. Mr Midlane explained there may be some delay due to Mr A’s commitments. Ms Anderson said the Expression of Interest could be lodged with copies of the relevant documen...

7. McClelland v Schindler Lifts NZ Ltd [2015] NZHRRT 45 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...(the equivalent rank and trade from the RNZNVR) and commenced his professional training to become a Marine Technician (Electrical) (MT(L)). After successfully completing the relevant courses he became an MT(L) and as such he was responsible for performing routine tasks and checks in his work space, this ensured that the correct amount of onboard spares were available. He completed the initial investigation during fault finding, operator level maintenance, and did the application of corro...

8. Dawson v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Wellington 36 [pdf, 242 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000043 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 36 BETWEEN ANTHONY AND ANGELA DAWSON Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (formerly known as NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) First Respondent AND OSBORNE PRICE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Second Respondent AND MARK AND JOANN-LEE FULLER Third Respondents AND GREG PAUL THOMAS (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND IAN BLACK Fifth Respondent AND BARNEY CORNAGA Sixth Respond

9. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 46 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...Director Fractionated Claims A s the demand for the resolutiou of claims through Treaty settlements increases, so too will the pressure on the Tribunal process increase. We have already seen an attempt to curtail the Tribunal process in the form of a Bill that proposes to stop the registration -of new c1aims and set a fi xed date for the completion of all claims. Although that draft Bill is unlikely to progress at this time, the pressure behind it will remain. Morris Love...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 20 Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 537 KB]

    ...intentions in resuming bargaining.5 The Court’s conclusion was that Jacks Hardware did not return to bargaining in February 2015 other than “…in a very restricted, artificial and strategic way”.6 The company’s bargaining consisted of a request for a concession and, when that was declined, to declare it was not prepared to continue bargaining.7 The Court concluded that the company’s statement, that it was returning to bargaining, could not reasonably have meant simply...