Search Results

1. Nisha v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 26 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...fee, because the first application was not progressed and lost. [6.4] $2,500 ($NZ) - compensation for unnecessary expenses as a result of the failure to progress the application. The figure was not related to specific expenses. [7] The Complainant requested the Tribunal’s assistance to have the personal documents returned. Thirteen birth certificates, and a marriage certificate have not been returned. [8] The Adviser provided submissions on the appropriate sanctions. In large part the...

2. Naidu v Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (Costs) [2018] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...2018 the Tribunal made two orders in favour of Dr Naidu: [1.1] A declaration that there had been an interference with the privacy of Dr Naidu by the refusal by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) to provide access to personal information requested by Dr Naidu under IPP 6. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Naidu v Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (Costs) [2018] NZHRRT 33] 2 [1.2] A compliance order requiring RA...

3. LI v MB Ltd [2022] NZDT 158 (21 September 2022) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...find no misleading or deceptive conduct. Outcome 13. LI has not proved any wrongdoing on the part of MB Ltd and therefore her claim is dismissed. Referee: J.F. Tunnicliffe Date: 21 September 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. BT v PO Ltd [2022] NZDT 80 (12 January 2022) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...vehicle under contract terms. Therefore, I am satisfied, on the balance of probabilities that BT is not entitled to claim $10,000.00. Accordingly, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Fuli Date: 12 January 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. H Ltd NB v QU [2023] NZDT 344 (14 July 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...$12,906.00 as described in paragraph 12, namely $10,324.80 and b. QU is entitled to 20% of his loss identified at paragraph 13 of $8970.00, namely $1794.00. Referee: G.M. Taylor Date: 14 July 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. DI v Trustee X [2022] NZDT 114 (8 August 2022) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...director of the company. The sum was advanced to the Trust as a loan and deposited by their solicitor directly to the Trust’s account on 12 January 2009. 2. BK and ON were married in April 2007 and separated in April 2018. The Q Trust was formed in 2008 with Trustee X operating as the independent trustee since its inception. 3. In October 2021 CJ and DI made a demand for the repayment of the loan of $20,000. CJ said he and his wife had for many years loaned money to their ch...

7. LX v GQ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1696 (31 May 2021) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...inconvenience to The Applicant. The Respondent is to collect the failed washing machine or pay The Applicant $250.00 to organise disposal herself. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 31 May 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

8. NE & SE v JI [2023] NZDT 661 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...vendor’s plumber must have noticed that the roofing paper was severely degraded on either side of the repair site and must have been aware there were wider issues with the roof. They believe the plumber and vendor had a duty to disclose this information, but turned a blind eye, and that the plumber’s work was negligent. The report from the contractor who replaced CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 the roof says there was no ‘change of pitch’ flashing and the roof was “no...

9. DN v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 248 (4 April 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...costs. The claim is not frivolous or vexatious nor has any party unnecessarily prolonged the proceedings. On this basis the claim for costs is dismissed. Referee: Nigel Wolland Date: 4 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. OQ & TT v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 276 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

    ...reasonable care and skill. 5. I find that N Ltd did not manage the flight with reasonable care and skill. I make this finding for the following reasons: CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 a) It was a term of the contract that N Ltd would inform OQ “as soon as reasonably possible if the airline needs to make a significant change to your confirmed flights or to cancel them”. OQ was not told of the flight change. N Ltd became aware of the flight change at least 3 months before...