10901 items matching your search terms
Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 42a Tax Invoice Civil Legal Aid Fixed Fees Victims' Orders against Violent Offenders (Applicant & Respondent) Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from...
...were concerned about being in New Zealand unlawfully. They did not want to overstay and it appears the issue of an interim visa for the husband allowed him to avoid adverse consequences to a greater or lesser extent. This was a matter Mr Hakaoro was requested to address in the Tribunal’s Minute. He has provided no satisfactory response. Mr Hakaoro had a professional obligation to address these issues with his client at the time, explain their situation, and determine what remedial action...
...been subject to privilege. That means that if Ms H did not waive her privilege, any response from Ms DS could not be disclosed to Mrs CB in any event. Mrs CB says it is most unlikely Ms H would waive her privilege. Although this Office could request information, it is possible to proceed from the basis of what can be ascertained from the uncontroversial information made available in support of Mrs CB’s complaint and review application. [18] It is reasonable to assume that Ms DS...
...1194 (Wai 3300, #3.1.20); and i. A memorandum of counsel filed on behalf of Professor Margaret Mutu (Wai 3300, #3.1.22). 5. Party status will be confirmed in subsequent directions. 6. Some submissions also considered the Crown’s application requesting that certain documents be kept confidential. 7. In addition to the submissions received from parties, the Tribunal has had the benefit of an urgent hearing to discuss the applications for urgency on Monday 8 April 2024. The p...
1 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 [1] Ms Wild filed her statement of claim alleging the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) interfered with her privacy on 23 June 2021. Ms Wild’s claim alleged MPI breached 1 This decision is to be cited as Wild v Ministry for Primary Industries (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 69. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 69 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 046/2021 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BET...
...Whether or not there had been any submitters or further submitters on the Proposed Plan who would need to be advised of the High Court Ruling and that they might become parties to the appeal; and (b) Whether or not the parties agreed with HNZ's claim to status as an interested party. [5] As already indicated, opposition was brought by the Appellant. [6] The Court called for submissions. [7] The Council having indicated that it would abide the Court's decision on the ....
...there is a legal requirement for a signature, that requirement can be met by an electronic signature under 226 of the CCLA. The electronic signature must adequately identify the signatory and adequately indicate the signatory’s approval of the information to which the signature relates; and is as reliable as is appropriate given the purpose for which, and the circumstances in which, the signature is required. 14. There was no evidence before the Tribunal of an electronic signature fr...
...under the guarantee. Both parties have agreed to reduce their claim and counterclaim to $30,000.00 in order to have the claim heard in the Disputes Tribunal. 10. When J Ltd became a client of M Ltd 2015, BM filled out and signed a “Client Information Sheet”. This included some information about J Ltd and its directors and also included two paragraphs above BM’s signature. The paragraphs read: “I/we give authority too M Ltd to act on my/our behalf for all tax types until f...
...factionalism continue to dominate the affairs of Ngāti Maru in the present context. [28] In fairness, it should also be emphasised that a significant reason for the length of time this proceeding has been before the Court has been due to requests from the iwi for time to continue to discuss, hui and wānanga relevant issues amongst themselves. The Court should always defer to requests from the parties to have to attempt a resolution of the issues themselves, with or without a...
...Clark. At the hearing of the Court on 29 March 1993 Ngarau Tupaea presented a submission to the Court as chairman of Huakina Development Trust. It was explained that the 23 Tainui Marae/Papakainga of the Manukau Harbour and lower Waikato River formed this Trust in 1983. That Trust considered the claim of Ngati Te Ata to Maioro. In his submission Mr Tupaea stated - . We also cite the support of Nga Marae Toopu as given at Iheir last meeting of 28 February 1993, and we all stand befo...