Search Results

1. LD v LT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1579 (12 August 2021) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...made in New Zealand), and it is not reasonably free of defects (or of an acceptable finish) in that an edge strip attached to certain end panels is glossier than the adjacent front facing panel surface in her kitchen and creates a visible lack of uniformity across the two surfaces (which catches the light). LD says this should have been avoided by the company by choosing a closer matching strip, in terms of colour and gloss, which she says is freely available in the country. Is it mor...

2. BB v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 10 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312826#DLM312826 https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312818#DLM312818 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to app...

3. NX v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 212 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...established on the balance of probabilities that he is entitled to any compensation from P Ltd, and his claim is dismissed. Referee: C Hawes Date: 2 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. TS v BO & TO [2023] NZDT 97 (22 February 2023) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...Respondents. 2. WU is to be removed as Respondent. 3. The claim against CX is dismissed. Reasons 1. The above parties are the owners of a cross lease title at [Address]: a. TS is a trustee of the S Trust which owns Flat 3. b. BO and TO are former owners of 1. c. WU is a former owner of Flat 1. d. CX is the current owner of Flat 1. 2. WU did not attend the hearing or offer any defence to the claim. The absence of a party does not prevent a hearing from going ahead.

5. MA v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 704 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...have found that MA breached X Ltd’s rules, there is no need for me to consider this issue. Accordingly, MA’s claim against X Ltd is dismissed. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 20 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. BT v HT [2024] NZDT 353 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...Zealand Law (online ed, Thomson Reuters) at [59.24.2]. 2 Blumberg v Frucor Beverages Limited [2018] NZHC 1876. 3 Frucor Beverages Ltd v Blumberg [2020] 2 NZLR 51 at para 129, quoting an Australian decision with approval. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

7. TN v A Ltd [2024] NZDT 752 (1 October 2024) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...commensurate with the service she received, in this case, half the contract price. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 1 October 2024 1 Subject to some exceptions that are not relevant here. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

8. EJ v ND & CG [2024] NZDT 400 (7 June 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...of this case. Conclusion 12. As I have found that EJ has proven he is entitled to be compensated for $12,000.00, an order is made to that effect. Referee: Ms Cowie DTR Date: 7 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

9. KS v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 540 (10 July 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...circumstances, I am not persuaded the applicant has been changed an excessive amount and on that basis the applicant’s claim is dismissed. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 10 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

10. KS v Q Ltd [2025] NZDT 16 (16 January 2025) [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...down as much it does when the 10kg weight is placed on the side of the mattress. b) The price paid is at the lower end of the mattress market. A reasonable consumer paying $549.00 for a king size mattress would not expect a very high level of performance from a mattress described as ‘firm’. c) KS purchased the mattress online and did not inspect or try the mattress. The mattress was listed as firm, however what is firm to one person may not be firm to another. KS did not make...