Search Results

1. AET Ltd v ZVB Ltd [2013] NZDT 196 (3 August 2013) [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...cut out of three joints. The sealant depth in two joints was satisfactory; however, the sealant in the third joint was found not to be deep enough. AET Ltd remedied the problem by putting more sealant over the existing sealant. [4] AET Ltd claims the outstanding sum of $4,224.69 plus $1,249.07 in interest and costs. [5] After some discussion, the parties agreed that the sealing depth should be half as deep as the width of a joint with a specified minimum depth. Is...

2. Marumaru v Waipakuranui Incorporation (2012) 279 Aotea MB 137 (279 AOT 137) [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...which state that “it was... resolved to authorise two family members to sign the lease of the Incorporation to the MacNab family.” [33] On 6 April 2010, counsel for the Incorporation submitted that Mr Marumaru‟s claims were vexatious and requested that the Court strike it out 2 . 1 In support of his position, Mr Bell filed the following: Copy of the Chairman‟s report for the year ending 30 June 2008, presented at...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 140 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...Auckland [2021] NZERA 586 at [116] (Member Larmer). 2 At [92]. (b) adding further alleged breaches of the University’s Charter and Academic Standards Policy regarding the University’s obligations in relation to equity, research-informed teaching, academic freedom, and its role as the critic and conscience of society; (c) adding allegations that Dr Wiles has been singled out by the University for alleged non-compliance with the University’s Outside Activities Po...

4. IB v IY [2016] NZDT 1407 (25 Feburary 2016) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...is claiming for the lower of these estimates. 10. Accordingly IY is liable in negligence for the estimated cost of repairs to IB’s car of $1,846.44. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 25 February 2016 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply...

5. BC v TG [2021] NZDT 1636 (13 October 2021) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...circumstances. 10. For these reasons it is not proven that TG is responsible for the collision. The second issue need not be determined, and the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Rendall Date: 13 October 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

6. HW v BU Ltd [2023] NZDT 3 (18 January 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...the signage was confusing, I also find that the respondent should refund the applicant the amount it charged him to tow his car, being $420.00. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 18 January 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. D Ltd v BQ & GN [2023] NZDT 27 (7 June 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...the balance of probabilities who it contracted with and therefore the application must be dismissed. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 7 June 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. TI v XY [2022] NZDT 243 (15 July 2022) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...is to be paid to JM. JM has said that it will refund the excess to TI if it is successful in this claim. Therefore, all costs claimed have been paid by JM. Referee: W Lang Date: 15 July 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

9. FS v Q Ltd [2022] NZDT 267 (19 December 2022).pdf [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...wrong or that it was not the course of action that would be taken by a qualified mechanic. I therefore find the claim has not been proven and must be dismissed. Referee: K Edwards Date: 19 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

10. DC v F Ltd [2024] NZDT 247 (7 March 2024) [pdf, 122 KB]

    ...provide its services with reasonable care and skill, I do not need to consider the second question. 8. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 7 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...