Search Results

1. IQ Ltd & Ors v ND Ltd [2023] NZDT 638 (11 October 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...not the Disputes Tribunal. Accordingly, on this ground alone, the Tribunal finds that it does not have jurisdiction to hear this claim. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 11 October 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. Te Manutukutuku Issue 29 [pdf, 9 MB]

   ...Manutukutuku will provide regular updates of basic information on new claims, the Tribunal's hearing and conference programme and progress with research projects, both in-house and com­ missioned. I hope this will go some way towards meeting the many requests we receive daily for more information on these subjects. As a start, and particularly for our new readers, this issue looks atthe background and workings of the Tribunal, introduces Tribunal members, and explains the role...

3. EQ v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 504 (13 October 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...lapse of time. B Ltd said that the relevant staff members were no longer with the company, and practices have changed in the years since EQ’s treatment. Difficulties in defending old claims due to records being lost and memories fading over time form part of the rationale behind having limitation periods, and could also be a reason to view a claim under the CGA as having been waived by such a long delay. However, it is unnecessary to decide CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 w...

4. Chalecki v Accident Compensation Corporation (Entitlement to Vocational Rehabilitation Costs, Decision Capable of Review) [2023] NZACC 88 [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...identify evidence to support that the provision of the requested vocational rehabilitation would have enabled you to sustain employment in your farming enterprise or that it would have been cost effective in the context of entitlements under your claim. With regards to your transportation costs, there is no evidence to support that this related to rehabilitation and as such, ACC would not be liable to reimburse these costs. [2] In respect of appeal ACR 102/22, this is an appeal a...

5. Hubert v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation of cover) [2024] NZACC 179 (12 November 2024) [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...disease, or infection, BOD respondent pp 89-111, at 100. [3] In 2002 and 2003 there was a review undertaken of the 1998 cover decision, however cover was not then revoked. Rather, Ms Hubert was informed by letter dated 2 September 2003 that her claim as lodged on 4 October 1997 remained covered, together with entitlements. [4] In 2021, the Corporation revoked cover on the basis the decision was made in error. The Corporation’s decision of 16 June 2021 stated: As you know, A...

6. A J Ball Family Trust [2012] NZWHT Auckland 37 [pdf, 93 KB]

   1 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 37 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6802: ALAN JEFFREY BALL AND PAUL STAFFORD O’NEILL as Trustees of the AJ BALL FAMILY TRUST- 44B Carlisle Road, Browns Bay ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Mr Ball and Mr O’Neill are the owners of 44B C...

7. ABC Trust v G Ltd [2021] NZDT 1307 (16 April 2021) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...but this claim being in relation to the construction of the road to the southern block. 13. It is necessary at this stage to outline some of the facts relating to the two events of the felled logs and the road construction (the following being information provided by the parties): a) Harvesting of the trees in the northern block took place in November and December of 2018. b) One of two haulers operating broke down in December 2018. c) The contractor that went broke while harv...

8. Claim to seized property [pdf, 142 KB]

   Addressed to: registrar district Court You need to hand in or post this form to the Collections Unit of your nearest District Court. this claim relates to property taken from: Name: Address: on (date of seizure) under a Warrant to seize Property. I, full name for an individual for an organisation doB: Your position: Address: organisations name: organisation’s address: Phone: Phone: claim ownership of, or an interest i...

9. ED v G Council [2023] NZDT 558 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...enactment”. 13. Accordingly, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in relation to ED’s declaration of non-liability and Council’s monetary claim. Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 24 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. SQ v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 195 (14 December 2022) [pdf, 179 KB]

    ...NN purchased the jewellery for her from the [shop] in [country]. 2. In the contract that SQ has with X Ltd, she agreed that she would: ‘provide a detailed description of the loss, damaged or stolen items, proof of ownership and any other information or evidence we ask for’ and ‘co-operate with us and give us any information or help we ask for’. 3. The sticking point for the parties is that SQ has not provided proof of ownership of the $20,000.00 bracelet and ring th...