Search Results

1. EC v ST [2024] NZDT 37 (23 February 2024) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...accident valuation of the vehicle, and evidence to support the value of the wreck. This evidence was supported by the evidence of NO who represented BC Limited. Referee: R Merrett Date: 23 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. SB v LQ [2024] NZDT 128 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...repair shop] where he took his bike to have the repairs done. The mechanic, NX, wrote that the engine had seized and needed to be rebuilt. He wrote that “it is hard to know the true representation of the running time of a motocross bike, as this information in most case is acquired through fitting an aftermarket hour meter… which can be tampered with at any point”. 7. SB had also asked LQ in a text if there was any damage he had not disclosed in the advertisement and LQ affi...

3. H Ltd v T Ltd & Ors [2023] NZDT 700 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...XX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. H Ltd were contracted by NX to build a house. NX contracted separately with B Ltd for the house plans. H Ltd contracted T Ltd for the site survey and layout. 2. When requested to start works, T Ltd requested plans from B Ltd to enable them to set out the site. H Ltd then started building set out work. However, as the project progressed, they realised there had been an error as the measurements on the plans di...

4. LB v MX & BJ Ltd [2024] NZDT 281 (22 February 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...of mistake would have been made in this circumstance. 10. Therefore, it is not necessary to consider the second issue and the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 22 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. DE & XE v SC [2024] NZDT 71 (15 January 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...$1,000.00 that they are claiming. 20. The claim is proven. 21. DE and XE remain the owners of the vehicle and they may dispose of it as they see fit. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 15 January 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

6. KT v EG [2024] NZDT 572 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...damages for the failure to return the bond immediately. Conclusion 11. For these reasons EG is to pay KT the sum of $158.00 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 28 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. EM & MM v QQ & Ors [2024] NZDT 675 (11 July 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...section from the respondents, QQ and SS. The applicants claim that the respondents were in breach of two provisions of the sale and purchase agreement, and claim compensation for their resulting losses. [2] The agreement was in the standard [redacted] form. The clauses that the applicants claimed were breached by the respondents were cll 6.1 and 7.1. These state, so far as is relevant: 6.1 The vendor shall not be bound to point out the boundaries of the property except that on the sa...

8. HD v NU [2023] NZDT 118 (9 March 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...was found they were fully blocked with tree roots and sludge and could only be replaced. The system was old and could now only be replaced with a new compliant system. 3. HD claimed for the cost to replace the septic tank system and the work performed to investigate the fault. 4. The issues to resolve the claim are: (a) Was the wastewater system in reasonable working order? (b) What loss can HD prove she is entitled to be compensated for? Does the proposed reinstatement pl...

9. Belle v Fogi Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...an extension for two weeks on the basis that his personal assistant had been admitted to hospital on 24 September 2018 and he had been on leave on 27 and 28 September 2018. [20] The application for an extension was opposed by the defendants, who requested the opportunity to provide a memorandum opposing the extension and seeking the strike out of the proceedings. In accordance with a timetabling direction, the application to strike out the proceedings and submissions in support were f...

10. JS v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for mental injury by sexual abuse) [2024] NZACC 114 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 169 KB]

    ...July 2024 Held at: Christchurch/Ōtautahi Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented I Hunt for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 15 July 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for mental injury by sexual abuse - s 21, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 9 August 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review...