Search Results

1. LCRO 180/2018 & 186/2018 KM on behalf of XYZ Trust v DF (5 May 2020) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...Billable hours that served no useful purpose save to generate those hours, and for which payment was received; (c) Failure (in July 2015) to recognise that an affidavit with the 1st delivery of discovered documents from the defendant was visibly informal, and was otherwise erroneous in several aspects; (d) Failure (in August 2015) to notify the plaintiff of the filing of an amended statement of claim, which was later found to contain careless errors because it had been prepared in...

2. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Privacy Act) [2020] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 353 KB]

   ...emailed to Ms Brown on the same day. The health advisor’s report was not referred to in Ms Brown’s report, as her report had been completed and finalised before the health advisor’s report was received. [9] On 22 January 2016 the Marshalls requested a copy of the findings of the IDEA Services investigation. Ms Brown sent an email to the Marshalls on 26 January 2016, attaching what she described as a letter of her findings. The attachment was the summary report prepared for NA...

3. CH v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1617 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...2 August 2018). However, I am not satisfied that the Heating System is operating as it should when it keeps dropping in pressure when pressured up, even if it is better since the work done by K Ltd and have concerns regarding its durability and performance over time. (j) CH has paid Q Ltd in full for the Heating System, but he does not have a Heating System that he is confident is working correctly because it is still regularly drops in pressure and the radiators are not heating consi...

4. TC v F Ltd LM [2021] NZDT 1590 (12 August 2021) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...fail to meet the acceptable quality standard. What about the fact that LM also represented that it had a current warrant? 8. Having a current warrant is a legal requirement. LM is required to get the warrant and must as a matter of necessity inform TC that the requirement has been met. I do not accept TC’s view that this means that LM is guaranteeing the warrant is validly issued or that the vehicle is in fact road legal. That is not fair to LM who is not required to guarantee t...

5. MT v CE Ltd [2022] NZDT 141 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...find that MT is entitled to the sum of $421.48 for a refund of the original fees, plus damages for the extra costs involved in setting up with a new provider. Referee: K Rendall Date: 15 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. EQ v MT Ltd [2022] NZDT 45 (16 May 2022) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...observed that some of the truck loads of fill delivered were not clean fill but were contaminated with building materials. He discussed this with TG, from MT Ltd, and was initially assured that this would be remedied. However, on 22 December 2022 TG informed him that MT Ltd was removing its equipment, and would not complete the job, remove the contaminated fill, or remedy other damage done to the property. 2. EQ claims the sum of $30,000.00 for the cost of remedial work, and completion...

7. ON v MB Ltd [2023] NZDT 132 (5 May 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...what some of the coins were advertised at on online auctions in the States. Conclusion 12. As ON has not proven his claim it is dismissed. Referee: Cowie DTR Date: 5 May 2023 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. BN v NI [2022] NZDT 130 (22 August 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...done to determine whether there was a leak anywhere else in the heat pump. The assessments and tests showed no leak. Subsequent to this, BN took possession of the property. 9. BN’s evidence that there was a leak relied upon the inspection performed by C of CB Company. C gave evidence at the hearing too. Her evidence was that by this time there definitely was a leak in the heat pump and there was no cost-effective option other than replacing it. There were leak and water marks on the...

9. EC v UI [2023] NZDT 615 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...industry costs for the damage done. I am satisfied that the bumper was off the car when the costs were assessed and would be reflected in the remove and replace costs. Referee: W Lang Date: 23 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

10. SO Ltd v NI & KI [2023] NZDT 189 (15 May 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...of that year he applied to [the bank] to freeze the account as he was concerned that LM was using the funds for his personal expenses. 11. LM read out an email he said he had received from IK on 20 April 2021 where he wrote that he was not informed that KI and NI were paid $5,000 and the money was therefore stolen by them from the account. 12. There is a great deal in dispute between the former directors and shareholders of SO Ltd and some of that history was canvassed during t...