Search Results

1. P Ltd v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 714 (14 December 2023) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...fit for the purpose. I accordingly find S Ltd liable to pay this amount. 15. In view of the above, I find S Ltd is liable to pay a total of $741.77. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 14 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. ED v NG [2024] NZDT 545 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...been individually costed. I would expect those items would cost well in excess of the $400 or so claimed for them. 16. Consequently, the amount claimed is awarded. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 2nd July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. IW v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 609 (8 August 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...receive a full refund of the purchase price. It follows from this finding that he is not liable for the $65.00 inspection fee referred to in the CU defence document. Referee: J P Smith Date: 8 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. IQ v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 22 (3 February 2025) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...outcome if an unknowing party was held accountable for a risk that the other party knowingly took. 6. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 3 February 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. [2021] NZEmpC 6 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...a legal adviser has a privilege in respect of any communication between the person and the legal adviser if the communication was— (a) intended to be confidential; and (b) made in the course of and for the purpose of— (i) the person requesting or obtaining professional legal services from the legal adviser; or (ii) the legal adviser giving such services to the person. (1A) The privilege applies to a person who requests professional legal services from a legal adviser...

6. Dixon v Dixon [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...assessor’s report and the repairs section, 15.6.2 and say the repairs are to modify design faults which should not be attributed to any installation by Harvey Roofing. There are no moisture readings showing water ingress through any of the flashings. Information indicates ingress of water via the cladding and window flashings and the unflashed parapet. Therefore, AHI say that there was no defect in the workmanship of Harvey Roofing. 23. The assessor has recommended, in relation to...

7. Savage v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 53 [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...now revoking, deeming Mr Savage’s application for review “unacceptable” now that the relevant decision had been revoked. There is no record of Mr Savage applying to review the 14 November 1998 decision. [8] On 3 February 2014, Mr Savage requested further lump sum compensation on the basis that he had received new medical evidence that the 1988 lump sum payment was inadequate. The new medical evidence referred to arose in the context of a District Court judgment on his enti...

8. Form 14 Waitangi Tribunal Application [pdf, 459 KB]

   Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 He tono āwhina pūtea rōia mō ngā whakawā o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi 09/22 form 14 Legal aid file No. Lead Provider’s Reference Application for Legal Aid for Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings To: Legal Aid DX SX10146 Welllington 1. He aha te nama Wai kua whakaritea mō te kerēme i mua i te aroaro o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti? (Mēnā kāore anō te nama kia whakaritea, tukua mai ā...

9. [2020] NZIACDT 17 - XA v Hill (10 March 2020) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...PRELIMINARY [1] It is alleged that Ms Hill, the adviser, used an unlicensed employee within her office, her life partner, to engage with her client, the complainant, and also to do immigration work that only a licensed adviser is allowed to perform. Furthermore, that she was negligent in permitting incorrect information regarding the complainant’s work experience to be provided to Immigration New Zealand. [2] The essential issue to consider is one of credibility, being whether Ms...

10. HU v UX [2022] NZDT 115 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...so how much. Did UX misrepresent the condition of the vehicle in relation to the fridge, heater or gas compliance? 13. A misrepresentation is a statement of fact, made by one contracting party to another, before or at the time the contract is formed, upon which the purchaser relies, and which proves to be wrong. If a misrepresentation has been proved, the other party is entitled to damages (compensation) even if the misrepresentation was innocently made, and not deliberate. 14. The...