Search Results

1. Geary v Accident Compensation Corporation [2013] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...INTRODUCTION [1] This case is about two information privacy principles. First, the principle that where an agency holds personal information about an individual, that individual is entitled to have access to that information (Principle 6) and to request correction of the information. Second, the principle that an agency which holds personal information cannot disclose that information unless the agency believes, on reasonable grounds, that disclosure of the information is permitted by...

2. Waitangi Tribunal Te Aroha Maunga Settlement process report [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...Tribunal determined that groups in the Hauraki district have well-founded claims concerning past Crown actions, which had breached the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, and caused them harm, or prejudice . The 12 iwi in the Hauraki district have formed the Hauraki Collective (the Collective), to ne- gotiate settlement of their claims with the Crown . However, one of those iwi, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, has raised serious concerns about Crown actions in the settlement negotiations . Ngā...

3. Wu v Manukau City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 65 [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...memorandum of 14 Page | 3 October 2011 and includes remedial costs, contingency fee, the Prendos project management fee and costs described as additional costs incurred as a result of the change of engineer and cladding type and Mr Marshall’s request. [5] The claimants state that although it was a term of the settlement agreement that the repair contract would be in accordance with NZS3910, Mr Marshall consistently refused to sign the required documentation. The...

4. EK v 2E Ltd [2020] NZDT 1384 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...ingress protection (“IP”) had deteriorated because of age. He also states the phone had clearly suffered impact damage since purchase which would also have contributed to the IP wearing down. NN states the CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 information provided by 2E does not cover the matter of IP in secondhand (albeit refurbished) phones. He also states the warranty does not cover water damage. 7. Purchasers do not have any information available on the 2E website, or provided...

5. NC & CC v FU Ltd [2020] NZDT 1389 (28 October 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...provided evidence of those costs and the full amount claimed, apart from the Tribunal filing fee, which cannot be awarded, is to be paid by CD, being $1694.00. Referee: Date: 28 October 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

6. LF Ltd v DQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 186 (8 November 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...respondent should bear 60% of the damage, leaving the applicant responsible for the other 40%. The sum payable by the applicant is therefore $999.77. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 8 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. N Ltd v NU [2022] NZDT 95 (10 August 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...caused by a failure to drive with reasonable care and skill. That failure was KL’s and hers alone. 10. Consequently, I have dismissed the claim against NU. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 10th August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. HC v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 214 (14 November 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...find that for the price paid, and regular and type of use expected, that a reasonable consumer would not expect such a watch to retain all its characteristics and functionality over a 3 year mark. In saying this I had some regard to its continued performance for over a year past the manufacturer’s 2 year warranty (acknowledging this is not the limit under the CGA) and that at least some deterioration could reasonably be expected over this period of time, not limited to wear and tear, e...

9. HS v MD [2022] NZDT 203 (7 December 2022) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...been paid out for it in October 2020 when they parted, when it would have had more value. 18. In accordance with substantial merits and justice, this sum is $2000. Referee: J Savage Date: 7 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

10. L Ltd v NO [2024] NZDT 113 (23 January 2024) [pdf, 174 KB]

    ...costs claimed are reasonable. They are proved with appropriate documents and invoices and are consistent with the extensive damage to LC’s vehicle. Referee: J P Smith Date: 23 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...