Search Results

1. LCRO 91/2017 DV v LS and HS (19 December 2018) [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...proceedings had not been served within the time-out period, a judge or a Registrar had the discretion to extend the time for serving them for a further six months. [34] On 6 November 2012, Mr J wrote to the Registrar at the District Court and requested an enlargement of the time within which to serve the negligence proceedings on the [City] Council. [35] That request was granted. [36] It was established at about this time by either Mr J or Mr E, that the WHT proceedings had been...

2. AD v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 118 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...compensation on the basis of the appellant’s taxable earnings from IRD was incorrect. The appellant had a valid CPX contract in place at the date of incapacity, which was annualised and the levies for which were paid. The ACC Brochure (which forms part of the contract) states, as to claims, that her pre-agreed payment starts once the claim has been accepted. The appellant did not have cover or become incapacitated for her mental injury before the contract was entered into. The...

3. LCRO 163/2020 DM v TN and EX (9 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...DM's leave application with the Authority in July 20XX. 4 [14] The Complaints Service wrote to Mr DM and informed him that Ms Z had ceased practice as a lawyer in 20XX, and that there was “no jurisdiction in respect to her.” It requested further information from Mr DM about his dealings with Messrs TN and EX, which Mr DM provided. Standard Committee processes [15] Mr DM’s complaint was initially assessed as being suitable for the Complaints Service’s Early Res...

4. TS v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 530 (10 October 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...The first time that he used it, the boat lurched violently to the right when he applied the throttle. The boat could only be steered straight with heavy pressure to the left. It was also noted that the motor was “running very rough”. 9. TS informed BS (L Ltd) about the issues. 10. TS’ son attempted a second launch, but the problems persisted. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 11. After a discussion with BS, it was agreed that TS would take the boat to [Boat Mecha...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 85 Agus Riyanto & 43 others v Dong Nam Company Ltd interlocutory [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...wages have been properly paid. [3] On 13 February 2015, the plaintiffs served on the defendant a notice requiring disclosure under reg 42 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 (the Regulations). Disclosure of 19 categories of documents were requested. Only six of those categories are now in issue, the earlier categories having been dealt with by way of a verification order. The outstanding categories were described in this way: The charter agreement 14. All agreements, cont...

6. BF v QT [2023] NZDT 600 (30 October 2023) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...paid by BF for the pool liner. Were the services provided with reasonable care and skill? 8. BF said initially Mr T’s maintenance of the pool was good, but it became very hard to get him to the property to replace the pool liner, or get much information from him about why. She said the liner was not ordered by him until July 2022, despite him quoting them and them accepting his quote in March 2022. BF said they paid $1,100.00 deposit for the liner in July 2022. CI0301_CIV_DCD...

7. LG v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 411 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...of [LG] viewing.” 2. The boat arrived later than originally anticipated. LG viewed the boat with his partner on 19 December 2023 and decided that it was not what they wanted. He advised OG in an email that he would not purchase the boat and requested a refund. OG said the deposit was non-refundable. LG claimed to be refunded his deposit. 3. The issues to be determined to resolve the claim are: (a) Was LG entitled to cancel the contract? (b) If so, is LG entitled to be refunded...

8. Examples of completed claim forms

   To find out more about how to fill in the forms you can check out examples of completed claim forms: When the dispute involves a motor vehicle accident When the respondent is a limited liability company When there are 2 respondents – a limited liability company and an employee of that company When a party is in a business and not a limited liability company or partnership When a party is a trust Example of how to fill in the acknowledgement from applicant's insurer...

   Located in:

   1. Disputes Tribunal >
   2. How to make a claim

9. Form 26 - Criminal legal aid -Tax invoice - schedules H & I [pdf, 421 KB]

   Templates V10 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 26 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim...

10. AM Ltd v ZN and ZNZ [2014] NZDT 575 (30 May 2014) [pdf, 32 KB]

    ...Date of Order: 30 May 2014 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that AM Ltd is to pay the sum of $8,212.15 directly to ZN and ZNZ on or before 21 June 2014; and the applicant’s claim is dismissed. Facts [1] ZN and ZNZ engaged AM Ltd (‘AM Ltd’) to prepare a preliminary design for a new house for their family. A written contract was signed on 5 September 2013 and a detailed design brief completed by the respo...