Search Results

1. ON v MB Ltd [2023] NZDT 132 (5 May 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...what some of the coins were advertised at on online auctions in the States. Conclusion 12. As ON has not proven his claim it is dismissed. Referee: Cowie DTR Date: 5 May 2023 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. BN v NI [2022] NZDT 130 (22 August 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...done to determine whether there was a leak anywhere else in the heat pump. The assessments and tests showed no leak. Subsequent to this, BN took possession of the property. 9. BN’s evidence that there was a leak relied upon the inspection performed by C of CB Company. C gave evidence at the hearing too. Her evidence was that by this time there definitely was a leak in the heat pump and there was no cost-effective option other than replacing it. There were leak and water marks on the...

3. EC v UI [2023] NZDT 615 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...industry costs for the damage done. I am satisfied that the bumper was off the car when the costs were assessed and would be reflected in the remove and replace costs. Referee: W Lang Date: 23 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

4. SO Ltd v NI & KI [2023] NZDT 189 (15 May 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...of that year he applied to [the bank] to freeze the account as he was concerned that LM was using the funds for his personal expenses. 11. LM read out an email he said he had received from IK on 20 April 2021 where he wrote that he was not informed that KI and NI were paid $5,000 and the money was therefore stolen by them from the account. 12. There is a great deal in dispute between the former directors and shareholders of SO Ltd and some of that history was canvassed during t...

5. P Ltd v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 714 (14 December 2023) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...fit for the purpose. I accordingly find S Ltd liable to pay this amount. 15. In view of the above, I find S Ltd is liable to pay a total of $741.77. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 14 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. ED v NG [2024] NZDT 545 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...been individually costed. I would expect those items would cost well in excess of the $400 or so claimed for them. 16. Consequently, the amount claimed is awarded. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 2nd July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. IW v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 609 (8 August 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...receive a full refund of the purchase price. It follows from this finding that he is not liable for the $65.00 inspection fee referred to in the CU defence document. Referee: J P Smith Date: 8 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

8. IQ v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 22 (3 February 2025) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...outcome if an unknowing party was held accountable for a risk that the other party knowingly took. 6. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 3 February 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

9. SN v CM [2025] NZDT 59 (20 February 2025) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...for his car is $8,500.00. Conclusion 10. For the reasons above CM must pay SN $10,522.00 (being the total of the amounts in paragraphs 6, 8 and 9. . Referee: Ms Jaduram Date: 20 February 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

10. EM v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 857 (17 December 2024) [pdf, 211 KB]

    ...compensation for repairs is dismissed. EM is however granted a declaration of nonliability in respect of invoice number 5300 dated 21 December 2023 for $251.75. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 17 December 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...