Search Results

1. Hohepa v Cassidy - Waima C30A and Waima Topu B (2018) 182 Taitokerau MB 166 (182 TTK 166) [pdf, 337 KB]

   ...Sam Lee of Thomson Survey Limited. It shows that Pihema’s 3 30 Whangarei MB 112 (30 WH 112). 4 77 South Island MB 18 (77 SI 18). 5 That application was amended on 14 November 2016 to include a claim for damages. 6 38 Taitokerau MB 132 (38 TTK 132). 182 Taitokerau MB 169 house, along with water tanks, a clothes line, a septic tank and soakage fields, are located almost entirely on C30A. [13] On 19 September 2014, Deputy...

2. Ram v Tan [2016] NZIACDT 39 (9 August 2016) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...Mr Tan accepted instructions to assist the complainant to deal with his immigration affairs after his colleague Ms Aasa had been representing the complainant. [2] There is no dispute that Ms Aasa represented the complainant poorly and failed to inform him of what had happened. Mr Tan was engaged in the instructions from an early stage, as he personally met with the complainant when Ms Aasa first accepted instructions. However, this was in his capacity as a proprietor of the practice. He w...

3. Findlay v Auckland City Council [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...engaged Mr Slater on a labour-only contract and that he had directly engaged the other contractors did not make him the head-contractor. Mr Findlay claims that Mr Slater owed the claimants a duty of care to ensure that the building work was performed in accordance with the specifications. Mr Slater’s Construction Experience [58] Mr Findlay contracted with his friend Mr Armstrong for the electrical work. He sought advice from Mr Armstrong concerning house building and...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 46 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...Director Fractionated Claims A s the demand for the resolutiou of claims through Treaty settlements increases, so too will the pressure on the Tribunal process increase. We have already seen an attempt to curtail the Tribunal process in the form of a Bill that proposes to stop the registration -of new c1aims and set a fi xed date for the completion of all claims. Although that draft Bill is unlikely to progress at this time, the pressure behind it will remain. Morris Love...

5. Mok v Boyd [2010] NZWHT Auckland 29 [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...the responses given by Mr Boyd under cross-examination by Mr Kohler. [52] Kelvin Andrew, is now a retired builder living in the UK and filed an affidavit in support of Mr Tibbits. Parties were given an opportunity prior to the hearing to request that Mr Andrew give evidence by telephone. As no such request was made I admitted Mr 9 Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson [1979] 2 NZLR 234 (CA). Page | 20 Andrew...

6. Auckland District Law Society v Parlane [2010] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...position, and advised the parties that it anticipated being able to make a decision later that day, and would deliver its decision to the parties, in writing, as soon as it could. The Tribunal retired, and after deliberation made its decision and requested the Chair to deliver the decision in writing to the parties. This is the Tribunal‟s decision of 13 September, 2010, now delivered in writing by the Chair pursuant to R.34 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Reg...

7. Auckland District Law Society v Parlane [2010] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...position, and advised the parties that it anticipated being able to make a decision later that day, and would deliver its decision to the parties, in writing, as soon as it could. The Tribunal retired, and after deliberation made its decision and requested the Chair to deliver the decision in writing to the parties. This is the Tribunal’s decision of 13 September, 2010, now delivered in writing by the Chair pursuant to R.34 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Reg...

8. Heads v Attorney-General [2015] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 703 KB]

   ...between receiving those payments and other entitlements. [21.6] His financial loss from not receiving New Zealand superannuation over four years is approximately $75,000 gross ($364.50 x 208). He also believes he temporarily lost access to other forms of assistance available to superannuitants but not to persons in his situation ie persons who have reached NZSQA but who are not in receipt of superannuation. [22] As articulated by Dr McCrimmon in her closing submissions, the claim by...

9. AJE, CDE, and JPS as Trustees of the EE Family Trust v Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd [2020] CEIT-2020-0009 [pdf, 348 KB]

   ...I accept, was that he was talking to Vero representatives on site before the landslip, that Mr E advised Vero representatives of the overspill, and that Vero agreed to fix the spouting. 10 [46] If as Ms Matheson says all meetings were formalised in writing, then it is surprising that no minutes were taken of the all-important meeting held on site on 18 March 2014 when Mr E’s evidence is that he says Vero agreed there must have been over spilling and agreed to engage GE Co...

10. [2020] NZREADT 34 - Hammond v Real Estate Agents Authority (11 August 2020) [pdf, 386 KB]

    ...works completed. She submitted that the fact that they had not been completed was withheld from her, as she did not see the David Jones letter until she received the Bundle of Documents for the appeal. She submitted that despite repeated requests, the appellants were never provided with the full EQC documentation, or sign- off documents. [51] Mr Todd submitted that the evidence before the Committee was that at the time she advertised the property in January 2019, Ms Tafilipepe...