Search Results

1. BG v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 249 (16 May 2023) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...outlined during the hearing, related to the deterioration in their relationship and the disagreement between them over the applicants’ complaints and their substance. This deterioration understandably escalated, particularly after the respondent informed the applicant that she or her representative, was prohibited from purchasing anything again from any of their branches. In the interest of a possible settlement, I explored with the respondent at the hearing, whether there could be a...

2. ET v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 109 (1 March 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...it was in the open position. 12. ET submitted that the physical damage to the screen was not the cause of the screen failure. 13. ET submitted that the fault he has experienced is a known problem with T Ltd flip phones. ET directed me to information available on the internet about a phenomenon known as the “black line of death”. I have read some of that information, about the experience of T Ltd flip phone users in various countries, and the description of the problem that thos...

3. E Ltd v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 757 (17 November 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...required standard of care for a careful and responsible worker, I am satisfied that the cutting action itself bears a great causal connection to the damage that any oversight by E Ltd. 15. Having reviewed the claim, invoices, and explanatory information about expenses and depreciation, I am satisfied the costs claimed are fair and reasonable in the circumstances. Depreciation has been made on the cable cost only, recognising that the freight cost for the replacement cable is a valid...

4. IV v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 305 (8 April 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...Ltd is not proved and there is no need for me to consider the issue of “remedy”. 31. For these reasons the claim by IV against O Ltd is dismissed. Referee: K Johnson Date: 08 April 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. KL v SN & NM [2024] NZDT 893 (16 December 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...1] was used as collateral for that loan. They said they did not understand what that meant until after these transactions had occurred, when they were contacted by the provider of their personal loan. They said if KL had checked the register and informed them of the situation, they would not have purchased the [vehicle 2]. 6. NM also said that KL was persistent in trying to get them to purchase a car and that she had to be clear about the repayments they could afford. She said that she...

6. Wu v Manukau City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 65 [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...memorandum of 14 Page | 3 October 2011 and includes remedial costs, contingency fee, the Prendos project management fee and costs described as additional costs incurred as a result of the change of engineer and cladding type and Mr Marshall’s request. [5] The claimants state that although it was a term of the settlement agreement that the repair contract would be in accordance with NZS3910, Mr Marshall consistently refused to sign the required documentation. The...

7. EG & EGE v UT & UTU [2016] NZDT 949 (21 April 2016) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...is dismissed against both respondents. Facts [1] EG and EGE (the applicants) purchased a property from UT and UTU (the respondents) in late 2014 and moved into the property in January 2015. A short time later, the applicants’ neighbour informed them that a large amount of greywater was discharging onto his property. [2] The applicants called in drainage engineers and it was discovered after investigation that water discharging from a shower, basins, laundry tub and washing mac...

8. Form-24_Criminal-Fixed-D-F.pdf [pdf, 219 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 24 Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules D-F Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus:...

9. EK v 2E Ltd [2020] NZDT 1384 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...ingress protection (“IP”) had deteriorated because of age. He also states the phone had clearly suffered impact damage since purchase which would also have contributed to the IP wearing down. NN states the CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 information provided by 2E does not cover the matter of IP in secondhand (albeit refurbished) phones. He also states the warranty does not cover water damage. 7. Purchasers do not have any information available on the 2E website, or provided...

10. NC & CC v FU Ltd [2020] NZDT 1389 (28 October 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...provided evidence of those costs and the full amount claimed, apart from the Tribunal filing fee, which cannot be awarded, is to be paid by CD, being $1694.00. Referee: Date: 28 October 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...