10901 items matching your search terms
Templates V8 – August 2016 page 1 He tono āwhina pūtea rōia mō ngā whakawā o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi 08/16 form 14 Legal aid file No. Lead Provider’s Reference Application for Legal Aid for Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings To: Legal Aid DX SX10146 Welllington 1. He aha te nama Wai kua whakaritea mō te kerēme i mua i te aroaro o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti? (Mēnā kāore anō te nama kia whakaritea, tukua mai...
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 He tono āwhina pūtea rōia mō ngā whakawā o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi 09/22 form 14 Legal aid file No. Lead Provider’s Reference Application for Legal Aid for Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings To: Legal Aid DX SX10146 Welllington 1. He aha te nama Wai kua whakaritea mō te kerēme i mua i te aroaro o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti? (Mēnā kāore anō te nama kia whakaritea, tukua mai ā...
...balance. AMEX understands Mr Hood has since been informed that payment is not being pursued. [2.5] Mr Hood does not currently have a credit card with AMEX and has not since January 2008. [2.6] On 28 May 2009 Mr Hood sent an email to AMEX in which he requested correction of personal information held about him by AMEX and requested a copy of an email he believed AMEX had received from the ARMS Group on 27 February 2008. [2.7] On or about 4 August 2009 Mr Hood made a complaint to the P...
...agreement were that the Applicants would pay $150.00 per week to cover the room, power, water, telephone, etc. This agreement was not evidenced in writing. The agreement came to an end on 11 July 2011 when the Applicants moved out following a request from the Respondent to do so on 3 July 2011. [2] The Applicants claim that in December 2009 they paid a $450.00 bond to the Respondent and they seek a return of this money. The Respondent denies that a bond was asked for or paid...
...District 13: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present form, it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pub...
...CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 22 April 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau By AVL Appearances: B Hinchcliff for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 10 May 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for treatment injury - s 32, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 5 May 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of: (a) the Corporation’s d...
...were sold. The question is whether this was an assignment prohibited by the lease, or is otherwise an alienation requiring approval by the Court. [9] When CHH divested its forestry assets in 2006, it sold shares in other lessee companies which formed part of its forestry assets. One of those was NZ Forestry Products Limited, which held a lease over land administered by the Maraeroa C Incorporation and other Maori land trusts. In The Proprietors of Maraeroa C Block v NZ Forest Pro...
...conduct that is often significant in terms of professional disciplinary matters may fall outside the course of providing immigration advice. For example, a licensed immigration adviser could be dishonest outside of their practice. [14] The Tribunal requested responses on the issue. The Registrar’s view is that the grounds of Mr MBL’s complaint fall within the broad definition of “immigration advice”, and accordingly are within the scope of section 44(1). However, her posit...
...enquiries about progress. He said that he was told by UU that plans would be completed and provided to the [council] before Christmas. This did not happen. In response to his further enquiries in January and February 2021, TD said that he had been informed that the [council] had requested more information, and that its progress was slow. TD then called the [council] himself, and learned that no plans had been submitted at that point. At a subsequent meeting, UU told TD that he, UU, had lear...
...between the parties? b. If so, what were the terms? c. Did TD breach the contract? d. What sums, if any, are payable by TD to NN? Was there a binding contract between the parties? 3. The relevant law is the law of contract. A contract is formed when both parties decide to exchange something of value. A contract can also be conditional, in that until the conditions are fulfilled the contract cannot be concluded. 4. In this case I find that the parties had entered into a co...