Search Results

1. IQ v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 22 (3 February 2025) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...outcome if an unknowing party was held accountable for a risk that the other party knowingly took. 6. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 3 February 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

2. EM v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 857 (17 December 2024) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...compensation for repairs is dismissed. EM is however granted a declaration of nonliability in respect of invoice number 5300 dated 21 December 2023 for $251.75. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 17 December 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. SN v CM [2025] NZDT 59 (20 February 2025) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...for his car is $8,500.00. Conclusion 10. For the reasons above CM must pay SN $10,522.00 (being the total of the amounts in paragraphs 6, 8 and 9. . Referee: Ms Jaduram Date: 20 February 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 6 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...a legal adviser has a privilege in respect of any communication between the person and the legal adviser if the communication was— (a) intended to be confidential; and (b) made in the course of and for the purpose of— (i) the person requesting or obtaining professional legal services from the legal adviser; or (ii) the legal adviser giving such services to the person. (1A) The privilege applies to a person who requests professional legal services from a legal adviser...

5. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Privacy Act) [2020] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 353 KB]

   ...emailed to Ms Brown on the same day. The health advisor’s report was not referred to in Ms Brown’s report, as her report had been completed and finalised before the health advisor’s report was received. [9] On 22 January 2016 the Marshalls requested a copy of the findings of the IDEA Services investigation. Ms Brown sent an email to the Marshalls on 26 January 2016, attaching what she described as a letter of her findings. The attachment was the summary report prepared for NA...

6. Waitangi Tribunal Te Aroha Maunga Settlement process report [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...Tribunal determined that groups in the Hauraki district have well-founded claims concerning past Crown actions, which had breached the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, and caused them harm, or prejudice . The 12 iwi in the Hauraki district have formed the Hauraki Collective (the Collective), to ne- gotiate settlement of their claims with the Crown . However, one of those iwi, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, has raised serious concerns about Crown actions in the settlement negotiations . Ngā...

7. Dixon v Dixon [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...assessor’s report and the repairs section, 15.6.2 and say the repairs are to modify design faults which should not be attributed to any installation by Harvey Roofing. There are no moisture readings showing water ingress through any of the flashings. Information indicates ingress of water via the cladding and window flashings and the unflashed parapet. Therefore, AHI say that there was no defect in the workmanship of Harvey Roofing. 23. The assessor has recommended, in relation to...

8. Savage v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 53 [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...now revoking, deeming Mr Savage’s application for review “unacceptable” now that the relevant decision had been revoked. There is no record of Mr Savage applying to review the 14 November 1998 decision. [8] On 3 February 2014, Mr Savage requested further lump sum compensation on the basis that he had received new medical evidence that the 1988 lump sum payment was inadequate. The new medical evidence referred to arose in the context of a District Court judgment on his enti...

9. Form 14 Waitangi Tribunal Application [pdf, 459 KB]

   Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 He tono āwhina pūtea rōia mō ngā whakawā o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi 09/22 form 14 Legal aid file No. Lead Provider’s Reference Application for Legal Aid for Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings To: Legal Aid DX SX10146 Welllington 1. He aha te nama Wai kua whakaritea mō te kerēme i mua i te aroaro o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti? (Mēnā kāore anō te nama kia whakaritea, tukua mai ā...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 17 - XA v Hill (10 March 2020) [pdf, 304 KB]

    ...PRELIMINARY [1] It is alleged that Ms Hill, the adviser, used an unlicensed employee within her office, her life partner, to engage with her client, the complainant, and also to do immigration work that only a licensed adviser is allowed to perform. Furthermore, that she was negligent in permitting incorrect information regarding the complainant’s work experience to be provided to Immigration New Zealand. [2] The essential issue to consider is one of credibility, being whether Ms...