Search Results

1. EK v 2E Ltd [2020] NZDT 1384 (2 December 2020) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...ingress protection (“IP”) had deteriorated because of age. He also states the phone had clearly suffered impact damage since purchase which would also have contributed to the IP wearing down. NN states the CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 information provided by 2E does not cover the matter of IP in secondhand (albeit refurbished) phones. He also states the warranty does not cover water damage. 7. Purchasers do not have any information available on the 2E website, or provided...

2. NC & CC v FU Ltd [2020] NZDT 1389 (28 October 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...provided evidence of those costs and the full amount claimed, apart from the Tribunal filing fee, which cannot be awarded, is to be paid by CD, being $1694.00. Referee: Date: 28 October 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

3. LF Ltd v DQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 186 (8 November 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...respondent should bear 60% of the damage, leaving the applicant responsible for the other 40%. The sum payable by the applicant is therefore $999.77. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 8 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. N Ltd v NU [2022] NZDT 95 (10 August 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...caused by a failure to drive with reasonable care and skill. That failure was KL’s and hers alone. 10. Consequently, I have dismissed the claim against NU. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 10th August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. HC v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 214 (14 November 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...find that for the price paid, and regular and type of use expected, that a reasonable consumer would not expect such a watch to retain all its characteristics and functionality over a 3 year mark. In saying this I had some regard to its continued performance for over a year past the manufacturer’s 2 year warranty (acknowledging this is not the limit under the CGA) and that at least some deterioration could reasonably be expected over this period of time, not limited to wear and tear, e...

6. HS v MD [2022] NZDT 203 (7 December 2022) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...been paid out for it in October 2020 when they parted, when it would have had more value. 18. In accordance with substantial merits and justice, this sum is $2000. Referee: J Savage Date: 7 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. L Ltd v NO [2024] NZDT 113 (23 January 2024) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...costs claimed are reasonable. They are proved with appropriate documents and invoices and are consistent with the extensive damage to LC’s vehicle. Referee: J P Smith Date: 23 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. OU v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 264 (14 February 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct, it is not necessary to consider the second issue about her loss claimed. Therefore, the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 14 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

9. DF v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 399 (7 September 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...and a cockroach in the property was not a problem which meant these services were not fit for purpose, this question does not need to be answered Referee: S Simmonds Date: 7 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

10. QD Ltd v SI [2023] NZDT 559 (17 November 2023) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...assessment is detailed, and the invoice is consistent with both the damage and the assessment. For these reasons, I find the amount claimed is reasonable. Referee: C Murphy Date: 17 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...