Search Results

1. Cook v Department of Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...therefore lack jurisdiction in respect of the second request.24 [80] Mr Tennet accepted that conclusion on jurisdiction but emphasised he drew this event to our attention in support of his submission that the Department’s responses to the two requests was evidence of a systemic failure to respond appropriately and lawfully to information requests. [81] We do not consider that the Department’s responses to the two requests provide an evidential foundation that supports Mr Tennet...

2. 207w Application for assessment of financial means

   MOJ 207 July 24 Ministry of Justice Collections Unit www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ 0800 233 222 PAGE 1 OF 8 When should I use this form? This form lets you find out more about a judgment debtor’s ability to pay a judgment debt. Use this form if all the following apply: • you are the judgment creditor and the money owed to you in a judgment or court order has not been paid • you have asked the judgment debtor to complete a financial statement but they have not complie...

3. [2007] NZEmpC AC 62/07 Taylor & Anor v von Tunzelman [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...said, he did not seek any remedies. [4] The Authority had insufficient evidence, after its first investigation meeting, to determine the amount of commissions owed and directed both Mr Taylor and his company, WPL, to supply the Authority with information about gross sales figures within 14 days of its first determination that was issued on 9 July 2007. Mr von Tunzelman says the respondents in the Authority have failed to date to supply any information to the Authority going to tho...

4. Te Manutukutuku Issue 71 [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...some improvements but was inadequate to settle past griev­ ances and also failed to protect the Muaū poko owners’ rights and inter­ ests in the years that followed. By the 1980s, Muaūpoko had walked out of the domain board, but promised reforms were never made. Perhaps most seriously, the Tri­ bunal found that the Crown’s actions, including its funding decisions, were complicit in the serious pollution and degradation of the lake and the Hōkio Stream. By 2010, Lake Horowhenu...

5. Tank Trust v Auckland Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 20 [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...Nonetheless, it is because of its fundamental investigative role that I think it is dangerous simply to interpret or gloss its explicit statutory processes by reference to Court procedure. [12] The Tribunal is empowered by s 73(1)(c) of the Act to request parties to provide copies of any documents that it reasonably requires. Section 73(2) requires parties to comply with any request or direction made under this section. [13] The Chair’s Directions and the standard direc...

6. Legal aid consultation on Criminal Procedure Act changes to criminal fixed fees [pdf, 637 KB]

   Criminal Procedure Act 2011 Consultation on proposed changes to the Criminal Fixed Fee Schedules Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity

7. EJ v HL & BL [2020] NZDT 1330 (10 June 2020) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...were present at the time of sale. 12. Ms J states that she had done less than 1,000kms of travel at the time she became aware of the defects, and that the float has spent most of its time in her ownership parked at her property. Whilst this information is not able to be subject to independent verification, the defects upon which the claim are based are not in the nature of fair wear and tear but are fundamental to the structure. Minor matters, such as a wheel bearing, safety chain...

8. DX & SX v TZ [2021] NZDT 1687 (27 May 2021) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...grow. Conclusion 19. For all these reasons TZ is obliged to pay DX and SX the sum of $1,430.59 in accordance with the terms of this order. Referee: Malthus - DTR Date: 27 May 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

9. QN v NI [2023] NZDT 128 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...claimed to be paid $6,349.61 for the costs he incurred to repair the property. 7. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Did NI agree to sell her house to QN? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 (b) If not, did NI allow QN to perform work upgrading the property that she has been enriched by? (c) If so, what loss can QN show he has incurred that he is intitled to be compensated for? Did NI agree to sell her house to QN? 8. QN said that the agreement was that he...

10. KH v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 166 (5 February 2024) [pdf, 238 KB]

    ...to cancel the contract and obtain a refund of the money paid, or to claim the cost of repairs that he incurred elsewhere and so the claim must be dismissed. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 5 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...