9864 items matching your search terms
...not by AM personally. c. No evidence has been provided to substantiate the claim for $4,000. 10. For these reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 21 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...
...comply with an order for discovery, a notice for further particulars, a notice for interrogatories, or other similar requirement under these rules; or (v) failing, without reasonable justification, to accept an offer of settlement whether in the form of an offer under rule 14.10 or some other offer to settle or dispose of the proceeding; … 24. The claimant states that items (i), (ii) and (iii) above cover the Council’s behaviour in question. 25. The claimant also refer...
...interference with Mr Gorgus’ privacy. Corrections has appropriately accepted this, as it failed to acknowledge or action either of those requests as required by PA, ss 40 and 66(4), without any proper basis. It is to that interference that any claimed causation must attach when the question of remedies is considered in relation to the First Request and Second Request. WHETHER CORRECTIONS HAS GOOD REASONS FOR WITHHOLDING OR REDACTING PERSONAL INFORMATION [32] Corrections submits tha...
...thought that the next step in the proceeding was to be taken by the Company and was waiting for that to happen. She also says that she was unable to pay a lawyer for advice. What any explanation must overcome is the fact that the notice which forms part of the statement of claim specifically advised Ms Little of her obligation to file a statement of defence within 30 days. While I accept that Mrs Little genuinely held the mistaken belief she refers to, it suggests that she failed t...
...April 2024 Held at: Auckland District Court Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented B Johns for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 17 April 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claims process – ss 134(1), 149(1) , Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 21 July 2022. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Cor...
...[6] Mr Nathan is seeking costs for the proceeding that led to the October judgment of $25,300 including GST. That is the amount of the costs actually incurred by him. In addition, disbursements amounting to $694.05 are sought. A further $1,000 is claimed for preparing the application for costs. 1 Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 135, (2016) 10 NZELC 79-070. 2 Nathan v Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd [2015...
...that concerns have been raised about his interaction with certain park user groups over time. It is also apparent that concerns around a tendency to escalate situations of potential conflict has been an ongoing issue raised with Mr McInnes in performance reviews. Mr McInnes’ 2010 review recorded an acknowledgement that he understood and agreed to seek after-hours direction from the park manager if he was in doubt. The performance review for 2011 noted that Mr McInnes recognised a...
...digging was to begin, OB was advised that some extra materials and work were going to be needed. On the day of the dig, costs escalated significantly, with an apparent change to the ground levels as well as other extra costs. OB signed a variation form which detailed the extra work but which did not record any extra price information. 4. OB says he was advised verbally that the extras listed on the variation form would cost $1800+GST. He says he also agreed to the use of a crane on the...
...Chief Judge) as Presiding Officer, and Derek Fox, Dr Grant Phillipson, Prue Kapua, and Kevin Prime as members of the Tribunal panel.1 Professor David Williams and Dr Monty Soutar are now also members of this panel.2 In January 2023, Chief Judge Fox requested Tribunal Unit staff provide a review and summary of existing research completed for other Tribunal inquiries that may be of relevance to the Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry. The Presiding Officer also requested a review and summary...
...approach 7 Provider rates and hearing activities 7 New policy 8 Case management levels 8 Amendments to grants 8 Amendment criteria 9 Non-lawyer costs and agents’ fees 9 Applications received before and after the July 2012 start date 9 New forms 9 Changes to existing policy 9 Reassignment policy 9 Consultation feedback 11 Questions 11 Proposed Family Fees Schedules: 12 4 Introduction he Ministry of Justice is introducing a new fee framework for fam...