Search Results

1. BT v T Limited [2024] NZDT 656 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...he ordered the correct quantity of materials and to check that what the builder wanted BT to order was correct. 6. Mr N, representing T Limited, said T Limited was provided with a handwritten list of roofing material requirements that it was informed was from BT’s builder. He said T Limited also sighted the plans, but it was not possible to know the quality of the product required from the plans. It can either manufacture materials based on what a client or builder orders, or alter...

2. KB v TG [2024] NZDT 800 (28 November 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 17. Therefore, TG is to pay K Ltd $9,075.51 by Friday 10 January 2025. 18. TG’s counterclaim is dismissed. Referee: C Price Date: 28 November 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

3. BU & SI v UQ & CQ [2024] NZDT 811 (20 December 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...continued to work. 18. As such, I do not find that the claim is proven and dismiss it. Referee: S Malaviya Date: 20 December 2024 1 Overton Holdings Ltd v APN New Zealand Ltd [2015] NZCA 526 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. I Ltd v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 567 (12 August 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...conclusion, I find that clause 25.3 of the contract prohibits Q Ltd from making a claim for consequential losses, therefore the counterclaim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 12 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. NM v OB [2025] NZDT 56 (22 February 2025) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 56 APPLICANT NM RESPONDENT OB The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NM purchased a [vehicle] from OB. The day after purchase NM was informed by others the [vehicle] was blowing blue smoke. NM later had a post purchase inspection of the [vehicle] and the inspection suggests a likely cause of the blue smoke is current or imminent engine failure and raised other issues. NM alleg...

6. ZP v EX [2024] NZDT 858 (10 December 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...$18,000.00 being the purchase price of D, the veterinarian costs incurred and the half share to euthanise D. Accordingly, I order EX to pay ZP $19,701.77. Referee: Nigel Wolland Date: 10 December 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. L and M v EQC [2019] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...determines whether the Applicant is entitled to recover the sum of $18,697.02 from the Respondent (EQC) said to be due to her for emergency repair works carried out to a number of properties owned by her or whether she fully and finally settled those claims with EQC and is, therefore, not entitled to recover that amount. [2] For the reasons that follow, I find that the Applicant is bound by the settlement agreement she entered into with EQC, the result of which is that the Applicant...

8. [2025] NZEmpC 187 Santamaria v Television New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...his employment would end. For present purposes it is sufficient to note that the settlement agreement provided that: (a) Mr Santamaria resigned and his employment would end on 31 May 2022; and (b) it was in full and final settlement of all claims either party may have against the other arising out of Mr Santamaria’s employment including its cessation. [3] The settlement agreement was signed by a mediator employed by the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovat...

9. Smith v Waitakere City Council [pdf, 220 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00277 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN SEAN SMITH Claimant AND WAITAKERE CITY COUNCIL First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 30 May & 1 June 2004 Appearances: Sean Smith in person as Claimant Susan Banbury & Georgina Grant for First Respondent Lawrence Ponniah for Second and Fourth Respondents Determination: 12 July 2004...

10. IPT Practice Note 2/2024 Refugee and Protection [pdf, 490 KB]

    ...APPEAL 4. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL OUT OF TIME 5. DEPORTATION APPEAL ON HUMANITARIAN GROUNDS 6. REPRESENTATION 7. CONTACT ADDRESS 8. FAMILY APPEALS AND CHILDREN 9. NEEDS OF APPELLANTS 10. OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT AND PRIVACY ACT REQUESTS 11. ORDER OF DETERMINATION AND REQUESTS FOR PRIORITY 12. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE 12A. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE APPELLANT 12B. EVIDENCE GATHERED BY THE TRIBUNAL 12C. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE RES...