Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...third parties. He says that in mid-2017 he received a call from Mr Speers asking about Mr AlKazaz’s duties while he was employed by DeloitteAsparona. The conversation was followed up with an email from Mr Speers to Mr Rosser reiterating the request for comment and attaching a series of CVs received by Enterprise IT from Mr AlKazaz leading up to his employment. Mr Rosser says he told Mr Speers that he did not think he could help him. He says that on both occasions he spoke to...

2. EJ v HL & BL [2020] NZDT 1330 (10 June 2020) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...were present at the time of sale. 12. Ms J states that she had done less than 1,000kms of travel at the time she became aware of the defects, and that the float has spent most of its time in her ownership parked at her property. Whilst this information is not able to be subject to independent verification, the defects upon which the claim are based are not in the nature of fair wear and tear but are fundamental to the structure. Minor matters, such as a wheel bearing, safety chain...

3. DX & SX v TZ [2021] NZDT 1687 (27 May 2021) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...grow. Conclusion 19. For all these reasons TZ is obliged to pay DX and SX the sum of $1,430.59 in accordance with the terms of this order. Referee: Malthus - DTR Date: 27 May 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. QN v NI [2023] NZDT 128 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...claimed to be paid $6,349.61 for the costs he incurred to repair the property. 7. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Did NI agree to sell her house to QN? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 (b) If not, did NI allow QN to perform work upgrading the property that she has been enriched by? (c) If so, what loss can QN show he has incurred that he is intitled to be compensated for? Did NI agree to sell her house to QN? 8. QN said that the agreement was that he...

5. KH v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 166 (5 February 2024) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...to cancel the contract and obtain a refund of the money paid, or to claim the cost of repairs that he incurred elsewhere and so the claim must be dismissed. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 5 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. CL & NN v BT & B Ltd [2023] NZDT 200 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...if there had been. BT explained that he is a builder of some 30 years experience. 9. CL and NN presented a short written statement from HI, the director of D Ltd, who they say is a specialist in retaining and piling work, though no supporting information was presented on his qualifications, experience and/or expertise. HI’s company was contracted to carry out repair work at the property. He writes, “upon removing the concrete pad and fully exposing the foundations it became apparent...

7. QC v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 782 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...to call Z as a witness, nor did he provide any explanation as to what then occurred in relation to the painting assessment. 9. In these circumstances I find it more likely that not that the final product was not reasonably fit for purpose. In forming this conclusion I considered the timing of the purchase, and when the painting was completed, and I gave some weight to the possibility that some minor damage to the paint on the walls might have occurred during the open homes. However, o...

8. IPT Practice Note 2/2024 Refugee and Protection [pdf, 512 KB]

   ...APPEAL 4. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL OUT OF TIME 5. DEPORTATION APPEAL ON HUMANITARIAN GROUNDS 6. REPRESENTATION 7. CONTACT ADDRESS 8. FAMILY APPEALS AND CHILDREN 9. NEEDS OF APPELLANTS 10. OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT AND PRIVACY ACT REQUESTS 11. ORDER OF DETERMINATION AND REQUESTS FOR PRIORITY 12. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE 12A. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE APPELLANT 12B. EVIDENCE GATHERED BY THE TRIBUNAL 12C. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE RES...

9. [2010] NZCA 56 CA14/2010 Petersons Global Sales Ltd v PB Engineering Ltd Ors [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...property which the Court held did not belong to them. Ground (1) misconstruction of the 2003 agreement [10] Having lost the initial rounds of the patent dispute PPSSL lacked the cash required to continue trading. So Mrs Browne’s company PGSL, formed in late 2002, entered the 2003 agreement with PPSSL to allow the business operated until then by PPSSL to continue. [11] Material provisions of the agreement are reproduced with emphasis added: [1] AGREEMENT SUMMARY The Manufact...

10. P Ltd v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1643 (8 October 2021) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...Ltd’s [vehicle] at an agreed price of $9890.00 including GST. 2. P Ltd claims $4,375.00 for the balance of the unpaid invoice of $3500.00 and collection costs of $875.00. 3. Q Ltd counter-claims $5000.00 as a refund for illegal work performed and to recover the cost of his original factory rims and tyres. 4. The issues to be determined are: a. What were the terms of the contract, and did Q Ltd breach the terms of the contract by failing to pay, or did P Ltd breach the...