Search Results

1. WT v DE Ltd [2024] NZDT 168 (8 April 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...repair and alterations business from part of DE Ltd’s shop. WT also ran lessons at the shop. 4. In July 2020 WT drafted a basic written agreement detailing the arrangement. Both parties signed the agreement. 5. In November 2023, DE Ltd informed WT that the agreement was cancelled. 6. WT’s claim seeks compensation (loss of income and other costs/losses) on the grounds that the cancellation was unjustified and unlawful. 7. The hearing took place in [City] on 26 March 20...

2. A Ltd & CB v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 528 (16 October 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...sufficient evidence to prove that the repairs the respondents undertook were the cause of the cooling system overheating. 15. I there find that the claim is dismissed. Referee: D Alofivae Date: 16/10/2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

3. LW v XE [2023] NZDT 96 (10 March 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...invoices which mention the additional faults. 10. Accordingly, the application is dismissed and there is no need for me to address the remaining issues. Referee: R Merrett Date: 10 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. LM v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 274 (10 August 2023) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...LM receive the terms and conditions of hire? If so, is LM bound by those terms and conditions? 4. U Ltd have provided evidence the terms and conditions were made available to LM when the booking was initially made. LM stated there was too much information provided and as his English is limited, he did not read the terms and conditions. 5. The terms and conditions are contained in a six-page document. I accept it may have been difficult for LM to read the document with English bein...

5. BT v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 274 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...purchased a [phone] online from T Ltd. He received the phone on 5 October 2022, and within a few days it was clear that the phone could not detect the pen or stylus as it was supposed to. BT took it to T Ltd’s kiosk at [mall] on 19 October 2023. BT was informed he was entitled to a replacement phone, because this was an out of box failure (referred to as an OBF). The [phone] was sent back to T Ltd, but it was repaired instead of replaced. When BT received the phone back, while at the [...

6. X Ltd v LG [2023] NZDT 358 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...except in certain limited circumstances (as set out in s 42). None of those circumstances apply in this instance. Therefore, this part of the claim must be dismissed. Referee: J Savage Date: 28 July 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. Te Manutukutuku 77 [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   ...plant variety rights regime, one of four issues heard in stage 2. The report was prioritised to provide the Crown with the Tribunal’s findings ahead of its introduction of legislation on this matter. In July, the claimants and Crown jointly requested Tribunal-led media- tion, an alternative pathway for the resolution of claims available under schedule  2 to the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975. Led by Judge Damian Stone and Prue Kapua, in October 2020 the mediation succeeded in settli...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 171 Alkazaz v Deloitte (No. 3) Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...third parties. He says that in mid-2017 he received a call from Mr Speers asking about Mr AlKazaz’s duties while he was employed by DeloitteAsparona. The conversation was followed up with an email from Mr Speers to Mr Rosser reiterating the request for comment and attaching a series of CVs received by Enterprise IT from Mr AlKazaz leading up to his employment. Mr Rosser says he told Mr Speers that he did not think he could help him. He says that on both occasions he spoke to...

9. ABN Ltd v ZYR & ZYQ [2013] NZDT 61 (17 May 2013) [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...on the residential property of ZYR and ZYQ. This driveway was to replace an existing driveway. [2] ABN Ltd was contracted to form the driveway so that it could be sealed by a third party contractor. [3] Two sections of the driveway were formed by ABN Ltd and then sealed by a third party contractor. The middle section was formed by ABN Ltd but not sealed because further work was advisable to ensure that the driveway in this section did not scour away or slump. [4] ABN Ltd...

10. KY v TU Ltd [2019] NZDT 1521 (23 May 2019) [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...obtaining a permit. 14. For these reasons, I find that TU was not entitled to clamp KY’s car, and must refund the $150.00 she paid to have her car released. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 23 May 2019 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you...