Search Results

1. LCRO 210/2018 RF v TG (27 August 2020) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...plead causes of action that were not in fact open to Ms TG to plead. [27] Mr RF argued that it was unreasonable for him to be criticised for making submissions on costs at the conclusion of the ERA hearing. He notes that he had made specific request of Ms TG as to whether she wished for him to provide submissions and had been instructed to do so. Further, Mr RF considered that the costs assessor had underestimated the costs involved in preparing the costs submission. 6 Natur...

2. [2010] NZEmpC 154 Villegas v Visypak (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...also a union delegate. His terms and conditions were contained in the Visypak (NZ) Ltd Collective Employment Agreement 2008-2011 (the CA). [4] On 5 September 2008 he received a written warning for an incident on his fork hoist that Visypak claimed should have been reported as a near miss. It found that he had driven across a wet floor in such a manner that he had lost control of the fork hoist, slid sideways and nearly struck a mobile floor scrubber that was being driven by a...

3. Dooney v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2022] NZACC 237 [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...Hearing: 30 November 2022 Held at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a-Tara by AVL Appearances: M Williams for the Appellant J Sumner for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment: 7 December 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for personal injury - s 26(2), Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 14 July 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decision...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - The Whanganui district [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...District 13: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present form, it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pub...

5. Brown v TPL 4 Limited - Motatau 1B5B5 (2017) 158 Taitokerau MB 88 (158 TTK 88) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...were sold. The question is whether this was an assignment prohibited by the lease, or is otherwise an alienation requiring approval by the Court. [9] When CHH divested its forestry assets in 2006, it sold shares in other lessee companies which formed part of its forestry assets. One of those was NZ Forestry Products Limited, which held a lease over land administered by the Maraeroa C Incorporation and other Maori land trusts. In The Proprietors of Maraeroa C Block v NZ Forest Pro...

6. Te Manutukutuku Issue 71 [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...some improvements but was inadequate to settle past griev­ ances and also failed to protect the Muaū poko owners’ rights and inter­ ests in the years that followed. By the 1980s, Muaūpoko had walked out of the domain board, but promised reforms were never made. Perhaps most seriously, the Tri­ bunal found that the Crown’s actions, including its funding decisions, were complicit in the serious pollution and degradation of the lake and the Hōkio Stream. By 2010, Lake Horowhenu...

7. HT v IF Ltd [2024] NZDT 333 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...website was also updated to remove that requirement. 14. HT said he had seen on-line months before booking that there would be pre-departure testing for Covid. I accept that HT read this on the IF Ltd website. But there is no evidence that it formed part of the contract between him and IF Ltd at the time he booked his cruise, because he has been unable to provide any evidence that it was still on the IF Ltd website at the time of his booking. 15. HT cannot rely on something he r...

8. ABW and ABX v ZYG [2013] NZDT 123 (17 September 2013) [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...agreement were that the Applicants would pay $150.00 per week to cover the room, power, water, telephone, etc. This agreement was not evidenced in writing. The agreement came to an end on 11 July 2011 when the Applicants moved out following a request from the Respondent to do so on 3 July 2011. [2] The Applicants claim that in December 2009 they paid a $450.00 bond to the Respondent and they seek a return of this money. The Respondent denies that a bond was asked for or paid...

9. Application for Waitangi legal aid form [pdf, 811 KB]

   Templates V8 – August 2016 page 1 He tono āwhina pūtea rōia mō ngā whakawā o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi 08/16 form 14 Legal aid file No. Lead Provider’s Reference Application for Legal Aid for Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings To: Legal Aid DX SX10146 Welllington 1. He aha te nama Wai kua whakaritea mō te kerēme i mua i te aroaro o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti? (Mēnā kāore anō te nama kia whakaritea, tukua mai...

10. Form 14 Waitangi Tribunal Application [pdf, 394 KB]

    Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 He tono āwhina pūtea rōia mō ngā whakawā o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi 09/22 form 14 Legal aid file No. Lead Provider’s Reference Application for Legal Aid for Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings To: Legal Aid DX SX10146 Welllington 1. He aha te nama Wai kua whakaritea mō te kerēme i mua i te aroaro o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti? (Mēnā kāore anō te nama kia whakaritea, tukua mai ā...