Search Results

1. LCRO 099/2016 IJ v KL (28 July 2017) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...review are whether Mr KL settled the matter contrary to Mr IJ’s instructions and authority, whether he overcharged Mr IJ, and following settlement 2 whether he withheld from Mr IJ copies of correspondence and information on Mr KL’s fee as requested by Mr IJ. Complaint [5] Mr IJ lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service on 9 December 2014. The substance of his complaint was that Mr KL: (a) Did not keep him informed or act in his interests....

2. AODT Operational Policy - DELETE [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...depending on the numbers of appearances. A 'whole day' in AODT Court is calculated on attendance at the Court for at least 8 hours. If the Court day is actually shorter than 8 hours, that should be reflected in a lesser time recorded and claimed on the 'Record of attendance/ invoice' form. • attendance at any whānau hui, which are required on occasion at the direction of the presiding judge • other attendances or preparation if required between court sittings �...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 236 Maheta v Skybus New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...time he had been away from that work.14 Skybus relied on the terms of the employment agreement to make this decision. [12] The Authority found that Mr Maheta refused to undertake retraining.15 Instead he wrote a lengthy letter to Skybus making requests for information about minutes of 8 At [27]. 9 At [26]. 10 At [28]. 11 At [30]. 12 At [31]. 13 At [44]. 14 At [44]–[45]. 15 At [46]. the meetings he had attende...

4. NN v TD [2021] NZDT 1343 (11 March 2021) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...between the parties? b. If so, what were the terms? c. Did TD breach the contract? d. What sums, if any, are payable by TD to NN? Was there a binding contract between the parties? 3. The relevant law is the law of contract. A contract is formed when both parties decide to exchange something of value. A contract can also be conditional, in that until the conditions are fulfilled the contract cannot be concluded. 4. In this case I find that the parties had entered into a co...

5. JT v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 227 (24 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...$75.00. She emailed Q Ltd suspecting the letter was a scam and was informed of her breach with photographic evidence. 2. Q Ltd subsequently have continued to charge administration/ recovery fees of $75.00 every two weeks. At the time of filing the claim, JT had paid Q Ltd $95.00 and had requests for payment from Q Ltd for $325.00. JT seeks an order that she is not liable to Q Ltd for $325.00. 3. Q Ltd did not appear at the hearing, nor were there any submissions filed in response to the...

6. DL v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 388 (5 September 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...problem with the hose reel is just as likely to have been caused by DL’s actions than by the product itself. 10. Therefore, the claim is dismissed. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 5 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

7. SH v I Ltd [2024] NZDT 463 (26 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...there was limited access. The subfloor states that it was ‘only viewed from hole in cladding as limited access’. HL submitted that this was sufficient notice to a prospective CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 purchaser that if more information about these areas was required then a further investigation would be needed. 6. I accept that the Report does state the limitations of reporting on the areas that SH later found to be defective. 7. I have also considered w...

8. Tank Trust v Auckland Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 20 [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...Nonetheless, it is because of its fundamental investigative role that I think it is dangerous simply to interpret or gloss its explicit statutory processes by reference to Court procedure. [12] The Tribunal is empowered by s 73(1)(c) of the Act to request parties to provide copies of any documents that it reasonably requires. Section 73(2) requires parties to comply with any request or direction made under this section. [13] The Chair’s Directions and the standard direc...

9. [2007] NZEmpC AC 62/07 Taylor & Anor v von Tunzelman [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...said, he did not seek any remedies. [4] The Authority had insufficient evidence, after its first investigation meeting, to determine the amount of commissions owed and directed both Mr Taylor and his company, WPL, to supply the Authority with information about gross sales figures within 14 days of its first determination that was issued on 9 July 2007. Mr von Tunzelman says the respondents in the Authority have failed to date to supply any information to the Authority going to tho...

10. HI v D Ltd and FB [2024] NZDT 26 (20 February 2024) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...September 2023 he was advised that a close family member was seriously ill. He was required to travel at short notice and booked flights to [City 1] and then attempted to book a rental car to drive to [City 2]. 2. He used the online booking platform, FS, which is operated by FB based in [overseas country]. His first booking was not able to be confirmed so he cancelled that booking and made another booking for a rental car with D Ltd. 3. A confirmation of his booking was received. H...