10901 items matching your search terms
Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma
Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma
...against KN is dismissed. It may be that the applicants consider they have claims against other parties. But that is a matter for the applicants to pursue. Referee: Souness - DTR Date: 9 February 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...
...through implied consent? • If so, what is BT liable to pay? Did BT agree to the clawback terms through implied consent? 8. The common law of contract allows parties to enter into contracts that are legally binding. A contract can be written or formed verbally or inferred from the parties’ conduct. A party can be considered to have agreed to contractual terms by their conduct. 9. I find that BT did agree to the clawback terms through implied consent. 10. This is for the fo...
...are not stated, nor is the evidence upon which he based his opinion. I am therefore not persuaded that the assessment of poor paint quality and poor application can be relied upon. 8. The door manufacturer did not view the doors but provided information on how they should be painted. SM and NM, directors of S Ltd, state all such manufacturers’ recommendations are followed. There is no evidence the recommendations were not followed, nor any evidence the doors themselves are defecti...
...strictly commercial aspects of the agreement, until its expiry. I see no basis for upholding this, or any other part of the applicant’s claim. Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 28 November 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...
...absence of good evidence about these costs, I allow $80.00 compensation. 10. In conclusion, LL is entitled to a refund of $560.00 ($640.00 - $80.00). Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 27 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 29 November 2022 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: K Koloni for the Appellant T Gee for the Respondent Judgment: 5 December 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for personal injury - s 26, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 October 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decision...
...once a quote has been accepted. 13. I am satisfied that QT was not liable to pay the extra charge for the plumbing work, because this had been included in the fixed price quote, and so QT is entitled to a refund of $1,298.00 (including GST) form B Ltd. Was B Ltd liable to pay for a camera inspection of the sewer sleeving? 14. I find that the quote provided by B Ltd did not include a camera inspection of the sewer sleeving, and so B Ltd was not liable to arrange and pay for thi...
...can start working through this information. The Police response [11] In terms of PA, s 40(1) the Police had until Friday 29 May 2015 to decide whether the request was to be granted and to notify Mr O’Hagan of that decision: 40 Decisions on requests (1) Subject to this Act, the agency to which an information privacy request is made or transferred in accordance with this Act shall, as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any case not later than 20 working days after the day on...