Search Results

1. HX & H Ltd v J Ltd [2025] NZDT 75 (14 February 2025) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...from $NZ11,213.00 to $NZ15,762.00. (e) A letter was provided from Mr T, who is known by HX, wrote that he inspected the trailer and found that the sub-frame was constructed out of steel, but the deck/tub and mudguards were all manufactured from formed aluminium. He considered that “it would appear that the trailer was in good sound workable/usable condition prior to the impact damage”. 7. HX considered the price to replace the trailer with a steel one would be $10,000.00. Ste...

2. Te Manutukutuku Issue 33 [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   ...customary Maori land (without payment of any compen­ sation). Proposals for the return of Crown land to Maori and the establishment of a fund as compensation for parts of Te Whanganui-a­ Orotu now owned privately or by local authorities also formed part of the report. A further hearing to hear submissions on possible remedies has been tentatively set down for the end of October 1995. HoroluojPipiri 1995 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • From t...

3. LCRO 87/2018 QZ v FZB (20 December 2019) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...18 April 2017 from Mr AL of the deed of appointment of trustees, and the authority to uplift, was that he would issue an invoice for his “attendances to date in relation to trust matters”, and when “cleared” would provide the documents requested.13 10 Mr VT's 19 April 2017 invoice: $750 plus GST (total $963.13). 11 Mr QZ's 7 June 2017 invoice: $2,360 plus GST (total, $2,792.20). 12 FZB, letter to Lawyers Complaints Ser...

4. UI & II v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 34 (31 January 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...‘reasonable care and skill’ only requires that suppliers apply reasonable judgement, which in the case of diagnostic services, requires that they go with the probabilities, applying the most likely fixes first. 11. No independent evidence, in the form of other expert opinion for example, was provided by UI and II to show that D Ltd’s recommendation to replace the seals on the 13-year old car was unreasonable in the circumstances. Further, D Ltd state that the leak appears to have...

5. OB v CM [2024] NZDT 121 (26 April 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...“ahs” in clause 8 has been changed to “has”. The date for payment has been changed to 16th May 2024. In all other respects the wording of the order remains the same. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 26th April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

6. Q Ltd v UL [2024] NZDT 129 (12 March 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...lease terms. The amount due is higher than the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, however Q Ltd reduce their claim to stay within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. 4. The matter was adjourned after the first hearing for the parties to obtain further information. When the hearing resumed, I was unable to contact UL. Calls went straight to voicemail. There were no further submissions from UL, and she had not been in contact with the Tribunal. UL had been informed of the date of the hearing. I w...

7. UM v BD [2024] NZDT 699 (15 November 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...after they declined to provide a replacement vehicle. I therefore find UM is entitled to a refund of 19 days hireage at $68.09 per day, which equates to $1293.71. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 15 November 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. KT & NT v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 374 (31 May 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...with its frame and motor. I find that to be reasonable and I further find that N Ltd should meet the entire replacement cost of the panels because the door was new. Referee: G R Meyer Date: 31st May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

9. [2009] NZEmpC WC 3/09 Mana Coach Service Ltd V The Tramways Union [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...was not in all respects a test case but, rather, one in which some, but not all, of the legal principles were well established. The case had some factual complexity illustrated by the length of time required for the hearing. [3] The plaintiff claims that the union contributed unnecessarily to increased costs in the document disclosure exercises before the hearing. For the defendant, it was submitted that the company contributed unnecessarily to increased costs by opposing the admi...

10. LCRO 50/2020 M and N PQ v WR (23 April 2021) [pdf, 276 KB]

    ...statements made by company directors, unless the statements were proven to be false. [25] Ms QM saw no evidence of collusion between Mr WR and Mr ZT. She considered that both lawyers had treated each other with courtesy and respect. [26] She had formed a view that Mr WR had responded to queries from his clients in a quiet and courteous way and concluded that Mr WR, during the course of the mediation, “came across as knowledgeable and confident in a considered thoughtful manner...